Defense bill bans funding for joint missile program

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:16pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - House of Representatives and Senate negotiators on Tuesday defied the White House and passed a defense budget bill that bans funding for the final year of a joint ground-based missile defense program with Italy and Germany.

The lawmakers prohibited a final U.S. payment of $400.9 million for development of the Medium Extended Air and Missile Defense System (MEADS), saying Washington has no plans to produce the system being built by Lockheed Martin Corp and its partners in Italy and Germany.

Industry executives and foreign officials say the government may face termination fees nearly equal to the money required to finish the system, which is financed by the United States, Italy and Germany.

It has been in development for more than a decade at a combined cost of more than $4 billion.

MEADS International, the Lockheed-led consortium developing the missile defense system, said the program had achieved several milestones in recent weeks.

It said a recent test demonstrated its 360-degree capability to detect, track and destroy an "air-breathing" target, a term used to describe airplanes and cruise missiles, versus ballistic missiles.

The White House last month reiterated its concerns about the bill, warning that a ban on MEADS funding could harm Washington's broader relationship with its allies, jeopardizing the kind of multinational projects favored by the Obama administration as budget pressures mount.

Failure to fund the final part of MEADS development could also make it impossible to take advantage of technologies developed by the program, the White House warned.


Other provisions of the 2013 defense authorization bill have prompted a veto threat by the White House.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and officials from Italy and Germany raised concerns this year about the ban on funding for MEADS, which was intended to replace the U.S. Army's aging Patriot air and missile defense system.

The Pentagon announced last year that it would stop funding the program after fiscal 2013, calling it unaffordable in the current budget climate.

That prompted some lawmakers like Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona to call for an immediate halt in spending on the program.

Italy's defense minister told McCain in a letter dated December 7 that MEADS was ideally suited to help address "the current and future air, tactical and ballistic missile threats that Italy, Europe and NATO will have to face for many years to come."

Failure by the United States to fulfill its funding commitment for 2013 would be "a unilateral withdrawal of our transatlantic agreement and (memorandum of understanding) and the U.S. would be held financially liable," he wrote.

Michael Amato, a spokesman for the Democrats who serve on the House Armed Services Committee, said U.S. participation in the program was based on "availability of appropriated funds."

He said lawmakers agreed to fund the program in fiscal 2012 on the condition that the Pentagon wrap up funding for the program, and propose a lower-cost solution.

"This year, the House and Senate were clear that they would prohibit the funds for this program as there are no plans for production," he said.

The White House had no additional comment, referring to its previous statement of administration policy.

(Reporting By Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
fromthecenter wrote:
I wonder if they would have done the same if it was based in Israel?

Dec 18, 2012 10:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
xyz2055 wrote:
Bravo to Congress. They finally did what they were supposed to do. They set ground rules for further funding beyond 2012, those stipulations weren’t met, so they are cutting off funding. The White House can huff and puff all they want. Sounds like Congress has the votes to override a veto on this matter. BUT, here’s the bigger question..with $1T deficits..why are we paying for air defense protection for Italy and Germany. Here’s a concept…PAY FOR YOUR OWN FREAKIN” MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM! AND, are those two countries really in danger of a missile attack from ANYBODY?

Dec 19, 2012 4:35am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.