Ohio governor signs law slightly weakening gun controls

COLUMBUS, Ohio Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:36pm EST

Ohio Governor John Kasich speaks during the CERAWEEK world petrochemical conference in Houston March 7, 2012. REUTERS/Donna W. Carson

Ohio Governor John Kasich speaks during the CERAWEEK world petrochemical conference in Houston March 7, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Donna W. Carson

Related Topics

COLUMBUS, Ohio (Reuters) - Ohio's Republican Governor Johns Kasich on Thursday signed into law a measure that would slightly weaken the state's law on carrying concealed weapons, less than a week after a Connecticut school massacre focused national attention on gun control.

The bill would require Ohio residents demonstrate competency with the weapon only once rather than each time the concealed carry permit expires. It also would allow carrying concealed weapons in the parking garage of the State Capitol.

Kasich signed the bill along with 41 others and did not hold a signing ceremony. A press release summarizing his actions put the gun law near the bottom of list of those signed.

Kasich foreshadowed the action earlier in the week, telling reporters he would sign it: "Whatever we do, we don't want to erode the Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens."

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives American citizens the right to bear arms.

Democratic state Representative Tracy Maxwell Heard said Kasich should not have signed such a "divisive" bill less than a week after a national tragedy.

"Rather than rushing to sign legislation that weakens our gun laws, we must use this time for a full, inclusive reflection," Maxwell Heard said.

Last Friday, a gunman opened fire at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, killing 20 children and six adults before shooting himself.

Michigan's Republican Governor Rick Snyder on Tuesday vetoed a proposed law that would have allowed some gun owners to bring concealed weapons into public places such as schools. Snyder said that the Connecticut shooting had influenced his decision.

(Editing by Greg McCune, desking by G Crosse)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
borisjimbo wrote:
Heller’s interpretation of the 2nd Amendment says handguns for self defense in the home and that’s all; the 2nd itself mentions a “well-regulated militia” “security of a free state”.

Dec 20, 2012 7:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jaroca wrote:
Jerk !!!

What an unfeeling SOB, pandering to the lowest common denominator. Was it absolutely necessary to do that this week?

Because one can does not always mean one should.

Dec 20, 2012 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
bobber1956 wrote:
This is going to be the stance for MOST of the States. Eat your heart out obama/biden. Be responsible-but carry.

Dec 20, 2012 8:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.