Putin signs ban on U.S. adoptions of Russian children

MOSCOW Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:52pm EST

1 of 4. Russia's President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during a ceremony to present high-rank officer personnel at the Kremlin in Moscow December 28, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Aleksei Nikolskyi/RIA Novosti/Pool

Related Topics

MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin signed a law on Friday that bans Americans from adopting Russian children and imposes other sanctions in retaliation for a new U.S. human rights law that he says is poisoning relations.

Washington has called the new Russian law misguided, saying it ties the fate of children to "unrelated political considerations", and analysts say it is likely to deepen a chill in U.S.-Russia relations and harm Putin's image abroad.

Six children whose adoption has already been decided in court will go to the United States, while 46 other children whose adoption was still underway must stay in Russia, Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, told Dozhd television channel.

The new law, which has also ignited outrage among Russian liberals and child rights' advocates, takes effect on January 1.

The legislation, whose text was issued by the Kremlin, will also outlaw some non-governmental organizations that receive U.S. funding and impose a visa ban and asset freeze on Americans accused of violating the rights of Russians abroad.

Pro-Kremlin lawmakers initially drafted the bill to mirror the U.S. Magnitsky Act, which bars entry to Russians accused of involvement in the death in custody of anti-corruption lawyer Sergei Magnitsky and other alleged rights abuses.

The restrictions on adoptions and non-profit groups were added to the legislation later, going beyond a tit-for-tat move and escalating a dispute with Washington at a time when ties are already strained by issues such as the Syrian crisis.

U.S.-based human rights organization Freedom House called the law an "attack against one of the most vulnerable groups in the Russian society."

The adoption ban may further tarnish Putin's international standing at a time when the former KGB officer is under scrutiny over what critics say is a crackdown on dissent since he returned to the Kremlin for a third term in May.

"The law will lead to a sharp drop in the reputation of the Kremlin and of Putin personally abroad, and signal a new phase in relations between the United States and Russia," said Lilia Shevtsova, an expert on Putin with the Carnegie Moscow Centre.

Peskov said earlier the Magnitsky Act - the U.S. bill which prompted the new Russian law - had "seriously undermined" the "reset", the moniker for the effort U.S. President Barack Obama launched early in his first term to improve relations between the former Cold War foes.

Putin has backed the hawkish response with a mixture of public appeals to patriotism, saying Russia should care for its own children, and with belligerent denunciations of what he says is the U.S. desire to impose its will on the world.


Seeking to dampen criticism of the move, Putin also signed a decree ordering an improvement in care for orphans.

Critics of the Russian legislation say Putin has held the welfare of children trapped in a crowded and troubled orphanage system hostage to political maneuvering.

"He signed it after all! He signed one of the most shameful laws in Russian history," a blogger named Yuri Pronko wrote on the popular Russian site LiveJournal.

A Twitter tag that translates as "Putin eats children" was being widely circulated in Russia on Friday, and pro-Kremlin microbloggers hit back with: "Putin supported orphans".

Russian officials say the deaths of 19 Russian-born children adopted by American parents in the past decade motivated the law, as well as what they perceive as the overly lenient treatment of those parents by U.S. courts and law enforcement.

Russia's investigative committee on Friday opened nine criminal cases against American families "threatening lives and health" of 12 Russian children and issued summonses for four American citizens as defendants in abstentia.

The U.S. government has so far refused to provide documentation in any of the cases.

Critics of the bill say Russian orphanages are woefully overcrowded and that adoptions by Russian families remain modest, with some 7,400 adoptions in 2011 compared with 3,400 adoptions of Russian children by families abroad.

More than 650,000 children are considered orphans in Russia - though some were rejected by their parents or taken from dysfunctional homes. Of those, 110,000 lived in state institutions in 2011, according to government figures.

Americans have adopted more than 45,000 Russian children since 1999, including 962 last year.

In a poll conducted on December 23 by the Moscow-based Public Opinion Foundation, 75 percent of respondents said Russia should place additional restrictions on foreign adoptions or ban them.

The acquittal on Friday of the only person on trial for Magnitsky's death will fuel accusations by Kremlin critics that authorities have no intention of seeking justice in the case.

A Russian court acquitted Dmitry Kratov, the former deputy head of a jail where Magnitsky was held before his death in 2009, after prosecutors dropped charges against him.

Lawyers for Magnitsky's family said they will appeal and called for further investigation.

Magnitsky's colleagues say he is the victim of retribution from the same police investigators he had accused of stealing $230 million from the state through fraudulent tax refunds -- a similar charge to the one Magnitsky faced.

The case against Magnitsky was closed after his death but was reopened again in August 2011.

In an unprecedented move, Russia is trying Magnitsky posthumously for fraud, despite protests from his family and lawyers that it is unconstitutional to try a dead man. A preliminary hearing is scheduled next month.

"It is the first time in my practice when a dead man is put on trial, and it's absolutely unlawful," Nikolai Gorokhov, lawyer representing Magnitsky's family, told Reuters.

"The guilty verdict is needed to show to the whole world that Sergei Magnitsky was a criminal, and not a man who uncovered a systematic theft of Russia's budget money," he said.

Magnitsky's death triggered an international outcry with Kremlin critics saying it underscored the dangers faced by Russians who challenge the authorities.

The Kremlin's own human rights council said Magnitsky was probably beaten to death, but Putin said in a televised press conference last week that he had died of heart failure.

(Additional reporting by Alexei Anishchuk, Maria Tsvetkova, Kiryl Sukhotski and Nastassia Astrasheuskaya; Editing By Steve Gutterman and Roger Atwood)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (44)
matthewslyman wrote:
> “Pro-Kremlin lawmakers initially drafted the bill to mirror the U.S. Magnitsky Act”
— NONSENSE. This later Reuters article is a better reflection of the FACTS:
> “Russian authorities point to the deaths of 19 Russian-born children adopted by American parents in the past decade, and lawmakers named the bill after a boy who died of heat stroke in Virginia after his adoptive father left him locked in a car for hours.”
— With adoptive parents like this, who needs American compassion? If this is the American alternative on offer, then whatsoever pitiful economic circumstances the Russians might be in (or, whatsoever circumstances we might THINK they are in, after reading our own “news” propaganda); they would still be better off being adopted by Russian parents.

If this has been tacked onto the end of a bill of diplomatic law, then it’s purely for administrative convenience, and for obvious diplomatic reasons. But when most Americans don’t know the difference between a friend and an XBox360, and most Americans can’t tell a Big Mac from a square meal; the Russians have reason enough for enacting this law.

Dec 28, 2012 5:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
hello023 wrote:
Actually matthew statically Russians who have adopted child from their own country have had more child deaths then the 19 out of the over 7000 that have been adopted in the last 15 year. Also the US adopts more special needs children from Russia then their own people so theres come American compassion for you. There are currently over 100000 orphans in Russia, this was just a weak move on the part of the Kremlin they are politicizing orphans, who is winning from this? Putun looks like a tough guy with the old and poor in Russia and looks like a fool to the rest of the world. Way to take a stand against the US by not allowing orphans a good home. Accidental deaths happen all over not just in the US.

Dec 28, 2012 6:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
hello023 wrote:
Wow, assuming you two must be trolls. American compassion? Americans adopt more special needs children from Russia than Russian do. There are over 100,000 orphans in Russia do you really think banning American adoption will help or hurt them? 19 deaths in the past decade statically is lower then deaths amoung children adopted by Russians. Accidental deaths occur all the time not to say there arent some people who are just wack jobs, but that is everywhere. This is a weak attempt by the Kremlin to look tough against the US because we called them out on human rights violation. American is not perfect not saying we are, however this ban is just Putun puffing his chest up and showing people he cares more about looking like a tough guy against the US then children that need homes.

Dec 28, 2012 7:35am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.