Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Senate Republican leader wants 10,000 troops in Afghanistan

Afghan President Hamid Karzai (L) meets with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) (R) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington January 9, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Afghan President Hamid Karzai (L) meets with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) (R) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington January 9, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:35pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on Monday he thinks that 10,000 U.S. troops should remain in Afghanistan after 2014, when President Barack Obama wants to withdraw most combat troops.

McConnell has just finished a visit to Afghanistan with a small group of his fellow Republican senators, his seventh trip there in the past decade.

"I think we're going to need a minimum of about 10,000 troops here to provide adequate training and counterterrorism in the post-2014 period. And we anticipate there'll be forces from other countries who will remain here beyond 2014 as well," McConnell told reporters on a conference call during a stop in Italy after leaving Afghanistan.

McConnell said he met with military officials including General John Allen, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, during his trip and that the officials felt the Afghans would be able to handle their own security after 2014 if there was a "residual" force that could be involved in training and counterterrorism.

"This is the first time I've come back from Afghanistan with a feeling of genuine optimism," McConnell said.

Obama and visiting Afghan President Hamid Karzai agreed on Friday to speed up the handover of combat operations in Afghanistan to Afghan forces, raising the prospect of an accelerated U.S. withdrawal from the country and underscoring Obama's determination to wind down a long, unpopular war.

The Obama administration has been considering a residual force of between 3,000 and 9,000 troops - far fewer than some U.S. commanders propose. Republicans had cautioned the administration against allowing anything other than conditions on the ground and security concerns to dictate the pace of the U.S. withdrawal.

On Monday, McConnell repeated what he said was strong praise for the Afghan forces from military officials he had met with.

"There's a widely held view that the Afghan National Army is definitely coming up to speed, that these are tough fighters who'll be able to deal with the Taliban or any other internal threats in the future and also rising optimism that the Afghan local police will be an effective force as well," he said.

(Reporting By Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
ArghONaught wrote:
Is Afghanistan a US state. No. Do they share any common heritage with the vast majority of westerners? Not really. Why are combat troops there? Is the government somewhat corrupt and tribal in nature – like all previous and future Afghan governments? Have the Taleban prevailed over many previous “infidels”. Is this trench warfare 2013? What do these self important republicans doing their own thing by themselves think they are doing? Perhaps assuring profits for the military companies? Ah yes…a reason…weapons trade? Who are their donors? Could it be? No way?

Jan 14, 2013 1:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Concernedcitz wrote:
Pay no attention to the obstuctionist hawkish GOP. They are not mainstream America speaking – they are bigoted fanatics.

Jan 14, 2013 2:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
yrbmegr wrote:
“Republicans had cautioned the administration against allowing anything other than conditions on the ground and security concerns to dictate the pace of the U.S. withdrawal.”

Republicans forget all about spending when they talk about defense. Money suddenly becomes no object. They’re not really serious about deficits and debt.

Jan 14, 2013 2:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.