Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Supreme Court declines to hear Republican voting challenge

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:12am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a legal challenge by the Republican National Committee to dissolve a 1982 decree designed to stop the improper suppression of voting by particular groups.

Without comment, the court decided not to review a March 2012 ruling by a federal appeals court in Philadelphia that extended the decree to November 2017, with modifications previously made by a federal district judge.

The decree arose from a lawsuit during New Jersey's 1981 gubernatorial election, when the Democratic National Committee accused the RNC of trying to intimidate minority voters through so-called "ballot security" measures.

These measures included the creation of voter challenge lists, and the posting of off-duty sheriffs and police officers, some of whom were armed, at polls in minority precincts, according to the DNC.

Under the decree, which later became national in scope, the RNC needs court approval to implement various poll-monitoring activities in minority precincts.

The RNC sued in November 2008 to void the agreement, citing a rise in voter fraud, changes in federal and state election laws, its good-faith compliance with the decree, and free speech rights.

But the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia rejected the request, saying the RNC had not identified any significant changes that would make it unfair to continue the decree.

In its appeal to the Supreme Court, the RNC said the 3rd Circuit improperly relied on prior case law and a federal civil procedure role to expand and extend the decree.

The DNC had urged the 3rd Circuit decision to let the decree stand, saying the lower courts were not divided on the issue, and that the appeals court had not abused its discretion in this case.

The case is Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-373.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
tatman wrote:
GOP/RNC Mantra: if you can’t win an election legitimately and fairly, resort to voter suppression.

Jan 14, 2013 10:53am EST  --  Report as abuse
Eugene31 wrote:
By 2017 it would be a safe bet that the GOP as it is now constituted will either be a permanent minority party or be a very different and more progressive critter.

Jan 14, 2013 11:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
CountryPride wrote:
DNC Mantra, if you can’t win an election resort to legalizing millions of foreign criminal invaders to be slapped on welfare and registered as new instant voters.

Jan 14, 2013 12:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.