Gun groups predict assault weapons ban will fail in Congress

WASHINGTON Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:45pm EST

1 of 2. Customers view semi automatic guns on display at a gun shop in Los Angeles, California December 19, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Gene Blevins

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Gun rights groups on Sunday forecast that bids to ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips would fail in Congress, as Vice President Joe Biden prepares this week to give President Barack Obama proposals to curb gun violence.

Even some congressional Democrats indicated that a bill to revive the U.S. assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 would have a difficult time winning passage in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and Democratic-led Senate.

"An assault weapons stand-alone ban - on just guns alone ... in the political reality that we have today, will not go anywhere," Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, himself a gun owner, told the CNN program "State of the Union."

National Rifle Association President David Keene signaled little appetite for compromise as the White House considers action on gun violence after the December 14 massacre of 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school.

"What we put the brakes on is anything that simply takes away a person's Second Amendment right for no good reason," Keene told the CNN show, referring to the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of the right to bear arms.

"The likelihood is that they are not going to be able to get an assault weapons ban through this Congress," Keene said. Asked about new limits on high-capacity ammunition clips, he added: "I don't think ultimately they are going to get that either."

Biden, who heads a task force on gun violence due to give Obama recommendations as early as Tuesday, has said he will recommend universal background checks for gun buyers and new limits on the capacity of magazines like those used by the Connecticut gunman.

Biden and three members of Obama's Cabinet are to meet with members of the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives on Monday as he prepared recommendations on how to curb gun violence in the United States.

The White House also has said it will try to revive the U.S. ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004 after being in effect for a decade. Democratic Senators Dianne Feinstein of California and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut are expected to introduce legislation on reviving the assault-weapons ban.

MISS AMERICA

The gun control debate has been heating up since the Connecticut massacre. The issue even came up during the Miss America pageant on Saturday night in Las Vegas. Miss New York, Mallory Hytes Hagan, the eventual winner, was asked during the competition whether armed guards should be put in schools.

"I don't think the proper way to fight violence is with violence," Hagan said, indicating that she opposes the idea championed by the NRA after the Newtown massacre.

The NRA has a long history of influence in Washington. It spends heavily on political races and says it has 4 million members. The group criticized the White House effort after meeting with Biden on Thursday.

Appearing on "Fox News Sunday," Larry Pratt, executive director of another gun rights group, Gun Owners of America, said: "We don't think that there is much likelihood that the Congress is going to move on making gun-control laws worse than they are."

Pratt also touted a House Republican lawmaker's proposal to get rid of "gun-free zones" around schools, and asked: "Are we really better off when we say, 'No defense is a good defense?'"

Representative Elijah Cummings, a Maryland Democrat, was cautious about the chances for a revival of the assault weapons ban. He told CNN: "I think that we have a possibility. But I think it's going to be very difficult. I think the things that we do agree on, it seems, (are) the universal background checks and the (limits on) high-capacity magazines."

Biden has been meeting with people on various sides of the issue, including the NRA and gun owners' groups, representatives of the movie and video-game industries and law enforcement.

The background check requirement would extend to all gun purchasers. This would close the "gun-show loophole," in which vendors at open-air gun sales events can sell without a background check on the purchaser. It would also extend to private sales such as those conducted over the Internet.

(Reporting by Will Dunham, David Brunnstrom and Patricia Zengerle. Editing by Christopher Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (32)
DemocratJohn wrote:
Excellent! I guess my letters to congress and NRA dues made a dent. It also probably helps that data on US and European assault weapons bans show that they do not reduce murder.

Jan 13, 2013 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
KyuuAL wrote:
Fail, huh?

Well, the next school shooting will be guaranteed within the next year or two. Until the politics on guns changes, these things will continue to happen — as the record shows.

Jan 13, 2013 9:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
flashrooster wrote:
Of course the gun lobbies predict that an assault weapons ban would fail, because behind the scenes they’ll be busy threatening politicians with running candidates against them during their next primaries, and lot’s of money spent on attack ads. They are protecting the profits of the industry they represent, the gun industry. It’s all about the profits.

They know there are a lot of unintelligent people in the US, especially on the right (sorry, but it’s true), who will believe anything they’re told. More guns will reduce gun violence. The liberals want to confiscate our guns. Any gun regulation is an attack on our 2nd amendment rights and would have been opposed by our Founding Fathers. We need our guns to protect us from a possible invasion from Mars. Any excuse will do. There’s simply no room for rational thinking because the conversation is dominated by the well-funded lobbyists for the gun industry.

If someone can show me a society where more guns created a peaceful culture free, or nearly free, of gun violence, I’ll apologize and argue in favor of more guns. With me it’s really that simple. Just a little common sense. Prove to me that more guns will mean less gun violence. That should be the standard that determines this entire conversation.

Jan 13, 2013 9:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.