Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

New York enacts gun-control law, first since Newtown attack

1 of 13. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signs the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act at the Capitol in Albany, New York January 15, 2013. The bill was passed by both the Senate and Assembly during a news conference.

Credit: Reuters/Hans Pennink (UNITED STATES - Tags: SOCIETY POLITICS)

NEW YORK | Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:50pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York Governor Andrew Cuomo on Tuesday signed into law one of the nation's toughest gun-control measures and the first to be enacted since the mass shooting last month at an elementary school in neighboring Connecticut.

The bill passed the Democratic-led Assembly on Tuesday afternoon, a day after sweeping through the Republican-majority Senate.

The bill expands the state's ban on assault weapons, puts limits on ammunition capacity and has new measures to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.

Cuomo pressed for passage of the bill after a gunman killed 20 students and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, just over one month ago.

The measure also mandates a life sentence without parole for anyone who murders a first responder. Just two weeks after the massacre in Connecticut, an arsonist gunman ambushed and killed two firefighters responding to a fire he had set near Rochester.

At a signing ceremony in Albany, Cuomo said provisions of the bill, such as limiting gun clips to seven rounds and mental health screening for weapons purchases, were essential to making New Yorkers safer.

"People who are mentally ill should not have access to guns, that's common sense," Cuomo said. "That's probably the hallmark of this bill, coming up with a system that allows for mental-health screens."

"Seven bullets in a gun, why? Because the high-capacity magazines that give you the capacity to kill a large number of human beings in a very short period of time is nonsensical to a civil society," Cuomo said.

Police have said the gunman in Newtown, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, carried numerous high-capacity magazines and that he changed gun clips several times, allowing him to unleash at least 150 rounds in his 10-minute assault on the elementary school. Some victims were shot as many as 11 times.

Gun rights advocates lashed out at Cuomo and New York's law, decrying the speed at which the legislation moved through New York's statehouse. The state's lawmakers have been back at work for less than a week.

"The National Rifle Association and our New York members are outraged at the draconian gun control bill that was rushed through the process late Monday evening," the NRA, the nation's most powerful gun rights lobby group, said in a statement.

"These gun control schemes have failed in the past and will have no impact on public safety and crime," the NRA said. "Sadly, the New York Legislature gave no consideration to that reality."

Also on Tuesday in Danbury, Connecticut, not far from Newtown, gun control advocates gathered for a rally outside a Walmart store to demand Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the nation's largest gun retailer, stop selling assault weapons.

Among those at the rally were Lori Haas, whose daughter was injured in the 2007 shooting at Virginia Tech, and Pam Simon, who was wounded in the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona, that also critically injured former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.

The Newtown killings plunged the rural New England town of 27,000 into grief along with much of the nation and prompted President Barack Obama to form a task force headed by Vice President Joe Biden to find ways to curb gun violence. Obama is scheduled to unveil the recommendations on Wednesday.

In a White House news conference on Monday, Obama signaled he will ask Congress to ban military-style assault weapons, require stronger background checks for gun buyers and put tighter controls on high-capacity magazine clips.

The assault rifle used in the Newtown attack is based on a military rifle and can be equipped with magazines that hold up to 30 rounds of ammunition.

(Additional reporting by David Bailey; Editing by Lisa Shumaker, Grant McCool, Andrew Hay, David Gregorio and Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
sandman839 wrote:
The guns are not the issue. First you have to make sure that the people who are buying guns can and should have them. This includes private sales. Second, along with a criminal back ground check there should be a mental health evaluation. Third if you own guns and you don’t secure them when you are not at home and they get stolen, you should have consequences. The guns that are being used to commit crimes are not the ones owned by gun owners who legally own them.

Jan 15, 2013 3:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
lensmanb wrote:
Just give the general population some more prescription drugs to treate them for anxiety or depression. Make the drug companies some dollars, keep the people who really need treatment out on the street, yeah! Years ago people with diagnosed mental problems were put away. I had an uncle who worked in one of the state hospitals. People convicted of crimes did their time, not let out early on parole. Our society’s “goody two-shoes” have created this problem with their liberal agenda. It’s not the gun that kills anyone. Restrictive gun control will only lead to law abiding citizens not being able to protect themselves should they desire to own a gun. I guess Louisville Slugger better ramp up production before someone declares a baseball bat to be a deadly weapon….wait, it won’t be the bat that kills…will it?

Jan 15, 2013 8:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
Ashau wrote:
Gun control; it’s hip, it’s cool, it’s pop, it’s what happenin’ now. Regardless of what the politicians say, it’s also not going to reduce crime in New York one bit. If anything, it will make it more dangerous for law-abiding citizens as it will reduce the concern criminals have of encountering an armed victim.

First, let’s get one thing straight; all this talk of banning “assault weapons” is ignorance. Assault weapons are fully automatic weapons used by the military. In NONE of the recent shooting cases were “assault weapons” used. They were military-appearing semi-automatic sporting rifles.

Now, to the inconvenient truth; it’s easy for politicians to chant the mantra of gun control. It’s something tangible, relatively easy and very visible to their voting constituents. It is also quite ineffective. As the article states, New York (along with Chicago) already has some of the toughest gun control laws on the books. I would ask; why haven’t those already enacted laws done anything to curb violence?

Here’s the multi-part answer.

First; because the courts do not effectively enforce those laws or enact the mandatory sentencing those laws call for as punishment.

Second; trading guns for tennis shoes is ludicrous. Not one individual with serious criminal intent will turn surrender his/her gun….not one. If they did, they would just go out and steal or otherwise illegally acquire another one. The ones who will abide by and be hurt by further anti-gun laws are the law-abiding citizens who are not a threat to anyone other than a criminal or nutcase bent on doing them harm. If one of these individuals can’t get a gun, he/she’ll use a knife, a hammer, a baseball bat, a rock, or even a car to kill.

Third: The focus should be on removing from society those determined to be dangerous to society, be they professional violent criminals, or mentally unstable individuals who have demonstrated intent to harm others. It’s harder. It’s not a sexy, catchy mantra. It’s not a politically correct move. But, it’s the only real way to curb the growing violence on our society.

So, instead of politicians screaming for more gun control in order to garner votes, they should be screaming for better enforcement of the adequate laws already on the books (more laws that are ignored are no better than the current ones that are ignored). They should be screaming for stiffer sentencing for individuals convicted of violent acts (And not just gun-related crimes). They should be screaming for much more thorough and stringent evaluation of unstable individuals who have demonstrated violent tendencies.

It’s the only way to reduce violence in our society. If politicians are unwilling (as in don’t have the guts) to call for and enact removal of dangerous people from the general population, they, and their constituents, better just prepare for more of the same because taking guns away from law-abiding citizens will not solve the problem.

Jan 15, 2013 8:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.