U.S. says to negotiate services trade pact with EU, Japan, others

WASHINGTON Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:44pm EST

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk listens to a journalist's question during a news conference in Hanoi September 3, 2012. REUTERS/Kham

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk listens to a journalist's question during a news conference in Hanoi September 3, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kham

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States said on Tuesday it plans to negotiate an agreement with the European Union, Japan and 18 other economies to remove trade and investment barriers in services ranging from finance to express delivery.

Washington, the 27-nation EU and a mix of other developed and developing countries have been exploring the idea of launching talks on an International Services Agreement for nearly a year.

Big emerging countries like China, India, Brazil and Russia have shunned the talks. They say services negotiations should be part of a bigger discussion that includes agriculture and manufacturing trade barriers.

The Doha round of world trade talks, which began in 2001 and includes all three components, remains hopelessly deadlocked. That has prompted the United States to explore other options.

"Every $1 billion in U.S. services exports supports an estimated 4,200 U.S. jobs in America," U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said in a letter notifying Congress of U.S. plans to launch services talks. "If business services achieved the same export potential as manufactured goods globally, U.S. exports could increase by as much as $800 billion."

Services account for about 80 percent of U.S. employment and the United States is already the world's largest services exporter, with international sales of about $1.7 trillion annually, an amount equal to about 11 percent of U.S. gross domestic product.

Even so, "international services markets remain heavily restricted and U.S. service suppliers face a wide range of barriers to doing business in overseas markets," said Mike Ducker, president of international operations for FedEx Express.

Senior congressional lawmakers also welcomed the launch of talks.

"As the global economy evolves, services exports like tourism and transportation must be an important part of our trade agenda to create jobs and strengthen our economy here at home," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said.

The Geneva-based services negotiations will include Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the EU, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey and the United States, Kirk said in the letter to Congress.

The group represents nearly two-thirds of global services and the United States hopes other countries will eventually decide to join the talks, Kirk said.

Washington intends to begin talks on the pact within the next 90 days and will press for rules to promote services trade over the Internet as part of the talks, he said.

The Peterson Institute for International Economics conservatively estimated in April that the proposed agreement could increase annual services exports among 16 core members by $78 billion. Since that study, four more countries have expressed interest in joining the talks.

"In absolute terms, the United States and the European Union would see the largest export gains, around $14 billion and $21 billion, respectively," the Peterson report said.

If Brazil, China and India were to join the talks, the trade gains would expand by about 30 percent, the report said.

(Reporting By Doug Palmer; Editing by Paul Simao, Andrew Hay and Stacey Joyce)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
MikeBarnett wrote:
Brazil, China, India, and Russia are correct to avoid the discussions because the financialization of the US economy has led, and continues to lead, to its downfall. Telecommunications, computer services, and express delivery are good topics for negotiations and agreements. The loosening of rules for financial and insurance instruments create new forms of gambling that increase risks through excessive hedging in funds and derivatives that cannot be repaid from the assets allegedly being “insured” against loss. $1 billion in assets should not have $100 billion is so-called insurance instruments. At some point, the alleged “insurances” will exceed the entire asset value of nations, and the real returns on investments will fail to reach the costs of insuring these investments. At that point, the entire financial systems of the excessively insured nations will begin to fail.

Jan 15, 2013 3:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.