Sponsored Links

U.S. business executives call for raising retirement age to 70

WASHINGTON | Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:29pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A business group of top executives on Wednesday proposed reforms to Social Security and Medicare that would raise the enrollment age for both programs to 70 but not raise Social Security taxes paid by upper-income Americans.

The Business Roundtable, which represents more than 200 chief executives from some of the largest U.S. corporations, also urged Congress to add a "premium support" mechanism to Medicare, peg Social Security cost-of-living adjustments to a lower inflation gauge and raise Medicare charges for wealthier beneficiaries.

This strategy for "modernizing and protecting our social safety net" would save $300 billion in Medicare spending over the next 10 years, make Social Security solvent for 75 years and help foster stronger economic growth, the group estimated.

The proposals come as President Barack Obama and Congress prepare for an intensive new round of deficit-reduction talks. Safety net programs including Social Security and Medicare are likely to take center stage.

The CEOs intend to pitch their ideas to the White House and to congressional officials.

"We are calling on President Obama and Congress to look at our plan and enact a package of gradual changes that will provide economic and personal security for generations to come," said Gary Loveman, CEO of casino and hotel company Caesars Entertainment Corp (CZR.O).

The former Harvard economist chairs the Business Roundtable's health and retirement committee.

Social Security and Medicare, once considered untouchable by U.S. politicians, are now at the foreground of deficit talks because of an aging population and rising healthcare costs that threaten to overwhelm the U.S. budget in years to come.

Proposals to raise the Medicare eligibility age to 67 from 65 and base Social Security payments on a slower growing "chained-CPI" are already part of the deficit discussion on Capitol Hill.

The group would push the age at which full Social Security benefits are paid to 70 for those now aged 54 and under. Currently, the age for collecting full benefits depends on year of birth, Someone born between 1946 and 1953 can take full benefits at age 66. That will rise to age 67 for individuals born in 1960 or after.

The group said sluggish economic and job growth, and bipartisan divisions in Washington, could make it easier for lawmakers to go farther in considering "politically risky" proposals such as Medicare premium support.

Those supports, which opinion polls have shown are broadly opposed by registered voters, would replace current Medicare benefits with a financial stipend for purchasing coverage from private insurers or the traditional program.

"There's nothing like impending pain to focus the mind, and the conditions the American economy faces are much more serious and sustained than any ... experience in my lifetime," Loveman said.

But the group rejected shoring up Social Security by making incomes above the maximum annual threshold - which in 2012 was $110,100 - subject to payroll taxes, saying that would hurt the economy.

"You would have to raise the base upon which the taxes are applied very substantially to drive a sufficient level of revenue to address the long-term solvency of the program," Loveman said.

"That would be far more damaging to economic growth than what we're asking people to consider," he added. "If you raise the tax rate on people who earn over the current threshold, you'll have an immediate deleterious effect on employment and economic activity."

The Business Roundtable plan would also encourage private savings and include newly hired state and local government workers in the Social Security system.

(Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Ros Krasny and Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
Wetsuits wrote:
“There’s nothing like impending pain to focus the mind, and the conditions the American economy faces are much more serious and sustained than any … experience in my lifetime,” Loveman said.

Especially when you can focus the pain away from yourself and onto someone else. These people are making proposals that give them no pain at all, and put all of it on people not as fortunate as they are. Scum.

Jan 16, 2013 7:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Swiss422 wrote:
Er…where does it say anything about raising the retirement age to 70? It just says they want the safety net to start at 70 — but they’ll still boot people out the door at 65. What’s wrong with this picture?

Jan 16, 2013 7:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
GeneStuart wrote:
And do these titans of industry and beacons the American Way of Life guarantee to employ the aging population to bridge the gap between ages 65 and 70?

Jan 16, 2013 7:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.