Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

No deal seen clinched in U.N. nuclear talks with Iran

Related Topics

Herman Nackaerts (C) and members of a delegation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) check-in before their departure to Iran, at the airport in Vienna January 15, 2013. REUTERS/Herwig Prammer

Herman Nackaerts (C) and members of a delegation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) check-in before their departure to Iran, at the airport in Vienna January 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Herwig Prammer

VIENNA/DUBAI | Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:54pm EST

VIENNA/DUBAI (Reuters) - The U.N. nuclear watchdog and Iran appear to have failed again in talks this week to finalize a deal to unblock an investigation into suspected atom bomb research in the Islamic state, a diplomatic source said on Thursday.

The U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran were expected to hold a further meeting on February 12, following two days of negotiations in Tehran that ended on Thursday, the source added, giving no further details.

The apparent absence of a breakthrough in the January 16-17 discussions in the Iranian capital signaled a new setback for efforts to allay mounting international concern over Tehran's atomic aims and help avert the threat of a new Middle East war.

The Vienna-based U.N. agency had hoped to clinch an elusive framework agreement with Iran that would allow the IAEA to resume a long-stalled inquiry into suspected military dimensions to the country's nuclear program.

The IAEA, whose mission is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, has been trying for a year to negotiate a so-called structured approach with Iran giving the inspectors access to sites, officials and documents for their investigation.

The IAEA team led by Deputy Director General Herman Nackaerts was due to return to Vienna early on Friday.

There was no immediate comment from the U.N. agency, which after a previous meeting with Iran in mid-December said it expected an agreement to be concluded in this month's talks. Western diplomats later said key differences remained.

World powers were monitoring the IAEA-Iran talks for any signs as to whether Tehran, facing intensifying sanctions pressure, might be prepared to finally start tackling mounting international concerns about its nuclear activity.

The six powers - the United States, France, Germany, China, Russia and Britain - and Iran may resume their separate negotiations later in January to try to reach a broader diplomatic settlement. They last met in June.

WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY?

Israel - a U.S. ally believed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal - has threatened military action if diplomacy and economic sanctions intended to rein in Iran's uranium enrichment program do not resolve the stand-off.

Iran denies Western accusations that it is seeking to develop a nuclear weapons capability, saying its program is aimed only at power generation and medical research.

The IAEA's immediate priority was to visit the Parchin military base southeast of Tehran, where it suspects explosives tests relevant for production of nuclear weapons may have taken place, perhaps a decade ago, accusations Tehran denies.

Western diplomats say Iran has worked for the past year to remove any incriminating evidence from Parchin, but IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said late last year a visit would still be useful.

Before leaving Vienna, Nackaerts said his team was ready to visit Parchin immediately if access were granted.

Tehran has said a framework accord with the IAEA should be reached before any visit to Parchin is allowed. It says the site is a conventional military facility and has dismissed accusations of ongoing "sanitization" there.

The United States late last year set a March deadline on Thursday for Iran to start cooperating in substance with a U.N. nuclear agency investigation, warning Tehran the issue may otherwise be referred to the U.N. Security Council.

Analysts and diplomats have said they still see a window of opportunity for world powers to make a renewed diplomatic push to find an overall negotiated solution to the dispute after U.S. President Barack Obama won re-election in November.

The six powers want Iran to scale back its uranium enrichment program and cooperate fully with the IAEA. Iran wants the West to first lift sanctions hurting its economy. Both sides say they want to resume the talks soon.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
psalm wrote:
The moment that Iranian experts are allowed to inspect western military and nuclear installation , then I would imagine the Iranians would allow inspection on the same terms. Until then, it is extremely unreasonable to have the expectation that we can inspect their secret facilities without offering the same right to the Iranian.

Jan 17, 2013 3:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IslamBlows wrote:
The average Iranian in Tehran couldn’t care less if a few remote sites, in the middle of nowhere, are obliterated by the US and Israel.

If they even thought that a strike would level Tehran, watch how fast those nukes get removed.

Jan 17, 2013 4:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Butch_from_PA wrote:
psalm – you hit the nail on the head.

Iranian nuclear weapons plans are 99% motivated as a defensive weapon to prevent other countries from bombing or invading them.

It’s a proven statistic – countries with nuclear weapons are not attacked – unless of course it’s small civil wars like in the former Soviet Union.

It’s also a fact – only one country used nuclear weapons on civilians – twice in fact. And this country is a declared enemy of Iran by proxy (thru relations with Israel).

Israel has repeatedly threatened to invade Iran – simply out of fear. This is unfounded fear.

Regardless – If I was in power in Iran – I would be working all scientists and technology related resources 24 hours a day to get nuclear weapons in place. The sooner they have them, the quicker there will be peace between USA, Israel and Iran.

In today’s weapons reality – Nuclear weapons in Iran are a non event. The moment they try to lift one in the air – a microwave bomb will take it out of the sky by shorting it’s electronics. The USA currently is watching all nuclear bomb sites world wide and has disabling rockets ready to take them out shortly after launch.

Places like Israel have more to fear that their own nuclear weapons will be compromised via espionage and exploded on Israeli soil. – similar to 911, however more lethal.

Jan 17, 2013 4:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.