Fragmented U.S. regulatory system stalls Dodd-Frank rules-GAO

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:41pm EST

WASHINGTON Jan 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. financial regulatory system remains fragmented two and a half years after Congress passed the Dodd-Frank law, and time-consuming coordination among regulators has stalled its biggest reforms, a government watchdog said in a report on Wednesday.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office said that as of December, regulators had finished fewer than half of the new rules called for by the 2010 law, which lawmakers crafted in response to the 2007-2009 U.S. financial crisis.

The Dodd-Frank law gave regulators new oversight of the $650 trillion over-the-counter swaps market, called for tough new rules to prevent banks from speculating with their own money, and sought to end "too big to fail" by creating a path for regulators to wind down giant, failing banks.

The complexity and interconnected nature of some required rules has caused regulators to get behind, as has the coordination required for multiple agencies to agree on joint rules.

Also, Dodd-Frank did little to streamline the overlapping organizational chart of financial regulation, which includes numerous federal and state supervisors, the GAO observed.

"The implementation of many of these reforms remains ongoing and the effectiveness of some remains an open question," the GAO said. The group consulted private and regulatory data and interviewed regulators to compile the report. It did not make specific recommendations.

Financial regulators have pushed out dozens of new rules called for by Dodd-Frank, but they are behind on some of the biggest changes.

A controversial ban on proprietary trading known as the "Volcker rule" was supposed to take effect in July 2012.

The five agencies responsible for the rule -- the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Reserve, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- have not finished writing it.

Officials also have not spelled out how new U.S. rules for swaps trades would apply overseas. Nor have they designated any non-bank financial firms for heightened supervision or implemented an international agreement requiring banks to hold more capital.

Some rules have been held up while regulators waited for other agencies to craft similar rules. And the GAO said other regulations require coordination among agencies and with international regulators, which can be time-consuming.

"Although regulators have established mechanisms to facilitate coordination and believe coordination efforts have improved the quality of the rulemakings, several regulators indicated that coordination increased the amount of time needed to finalize rulemakings," the report said.

Elisse Walter, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said in response to the report that implementing Dodd-Frank has been a "major undertaking" but that the SEC has made considerable progress implementing the law.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
regsrock wrote:
It is time to energetically approach getting the Dodd-Frank rulemakings through the process and into the law books, so Americans can be protected from the irresponsible behavior that allowed the 2008 financial collapse to happen.

Regulators must figure find a way to streamline this process. Too many rules remain unwritten and over a hundred deadlines have been missed. This is unacceptable. This delay, along with the obstruction from Wall Street firms filing suit against rulemakings that do become finalized, leaves critical gaps in our financial regulations that could potentially lead to another catastrophe. Isn’t this the point of a strong system of standards? To stop bad things from happening.

Financial regulators have been dragging their feet long enough.

Jan 24, 2013 4:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.