Court ruling on Obama's appointments a victory: Corker

WASHINGTON Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:23pm EST

Senator Robert Corker (R-TN) speaks to the media before voting on a bill allowing a rise in the debt ceiling on Capitol Hill in Washington in this file photo taken August 2, 2011. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Senator Robert Corker (R-TN) speaks to the media before voting on a bill allowing a rise in the debt ceiling on Capitol Hill in Washington in this file photo taken August 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Republican U.S. senator on Sunday said a federal appeals court ruling against President Barack Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board could invalidate rulings made by the agency.

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that Obama violated the U.S. Constitution when he used recess appointments in January 2012 and installed three nominees to the NLRB.

Senator Robert Corker said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday" that the ruling indicated the administration had overreached, characterizing the appointments as abusive.

"It was a huge victory for anybody who believes in balance of power and the Constitution," Corker said. "This ruling is very far-reaching and actually knocks down decades of action by presidents, as far as common practice goes."

The labor board nominees were facing stiff Republican opposition and Obama side-stepped Senate confirmations hearings by installing them with recess appointments. Republicans said he had undercut the Senate's power to confirm nominees because although most of its members were out of town, the chamber had not formally adjourned.

Friday's ruling also could limit presidential power to push through federal nominees and may be used to undo more decisions by the NLRB, and regulations by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The consumer agency's director, Richard Cordray, was named at the same time as the board members.

Corker was asked if the ruling invalidates more than 300 rulings made by the NLRB in the past year and those regulations established under Cordray at the CFPB and said it "could well do it."

"In each case, someone might have to challenge the rulings to make them invalid," he said.

The White House has said the court decision will not impact Cordray.

The No. 2 Senate Democrat, Dick Durbin, defended the White House's use of recess appointments due to fierce Republican resistance.

"In its frustration, this administration said, we were elected to govern," Durbin said "Fox News Sunday." "Whether it's a National Labor Relations Board or whatever, they wanted to put people in place to govern."

(Reporting By Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
JamesChirico wrote:
It is the GOP that undermines the constitutional power of an acting executive and majority in the Senate, in the public.

The GOP lost in congress when the NLRB was formed. It uses parliamentary rules abuses to undermine the constitutions 50+ in the Senate for consent of appointees, passage of bills. It uses dirty little tricks in state house to suppress voters, to have minority votes become majority electoral college votes. Agencies it is against do not receive funding, do not have people appointed confirmed.

Americans are waking up to the fact the GOP does not have any supportable policies, will use every dirty trick in the book to stop a functioning government, stop we the people from having a majority represented in those we elect. The president naive about the GOP offered olive branches, kept his mouth shut the first 2 years. He now gives them the same attacks, the same undermining of constitutional authority and they cry like babies. The agencies under the executive enforcing the law act at the discretion of the president. Sen. Corker is wrong in thinking ruling are void because agency heads were not confirmed. It also is up to Reid to shut down the Senate for 4 days to allow these recess appoints. There is usually only 2 sessions in a congress. There is nothing in the law that says there can’t be hundreds of sessions each congress, only that congress meets at least once a year.

Jan 28, 2013 7:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.