Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

NATO chief to warn defense cuts could endanger alliance's power

Related Topics

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen addresses a news conference during a NATO foreign ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels December 5, 2012. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen addresses a news conference during a NATO foreign ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels December 5, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Francois Lenoir

BRUSSELS | Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:15pm EST

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - NATO's military power and global influence could be put at risk if allies continue to slash their defense budgets while emerging powers boost theirs, NATO's chief will warn on Thursday.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen is also expected to warn in his annual report, due out later on Thursday, that too deep defense cuts could worsen the West's economic crisis by weakening defense industries that are key drivers of innovation, jobs and exports.

Rasmussen's message will be that military power will remain essential if NATO wants to keep its people safe and retain global influence, NATO officials said.

He will urge allies to keep defense spending steady in 2013 and to spend more on the military once their economies pick up.

"He will make clear that we can't expect security challenges to just go away while we are focused on fixing our economies. In fact, just the opposite. There is a risk that challenges will get more complicated, more complex, because the world out there is so unpredictable," a NATO official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said.

The global financial crisis has forced many NATO allies into drastic measures to reduce their budget deficits, leading to sometimes sharp cuts in defense spending.

Only a handful of the 28 NATO allies - the United States, Britain and Greece - last year spent more on defense than the two percent of Gross Domestic Product target set by NATO.

Some could look to make further cuts once the NATO-led force ends combat operations in Afghanistan at the end of 2014.

Rasmussen will say in the report that NATO remains the world's most important military power, with NATO countries still accounting for more than half of global defense spending.

CAPABILITY GAP

But he will warn that defense spending among the allies is increasingly uneven, not just between North America and Europe, but also among European allies, as some cut defense spending more than others.

If this capability gap continues to grow, it could limit the allies' ability to work together and risk weakening political support for NATO in the United States.

While total defense spending by NATO members has been going down in recent years, the defense spending of new and emerging powers has been going up.

If those trends continue, NATO's military capacity and political credibility could be put at risk, Rasmussen will say.

The rise of emerging powers could create a growing gap between their capacity to act and exert influence on the international stage and NATO's ability to do so, he will say.

Rasmussen will not name any countries but China boosted military spending by 11 percent last year, continuing a near-unbroken string of double-digit rises across two decades.

Defense spending by NATO's military superpower, the United States, is set to be $633 billion this year.

That dwarfs China's official military spending, $110 billion in 2012, although many foreign experts believe Beijing's public budget undercounts its real spending on military modernization.

China's growing military influence has coincided with a more assertive diplomatic tone, evident in rows with Japan and Southeast Asia over disputed islands.

(Editing by Rosalind Russell)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Inertia wrote:
NATO should be concerned. After all, without the US they are pretty much nothing. They should lean on all the other countries to contribute more. Actually… anything.

Jan 30, 2013 6:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Kailim wrote:
Nato was a defensive alliance facing an obviously standing enemy, the USSR. It has become an offensive alliance looking for enemies now.

Jan 30, 2013 10:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Free_Pacific wrote:
Kailim wrote:
Nato was a defensive alliance facing an obviously standing enemy, the USSR. It has become an offensive alliance looking for enemies now.

Unlike China. Who happens to be morphing into the standing enemy of over 2 billion people. Expect stronger contacts for NATO in SEA.

Jan 31, 2013 12:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.