Time Inc cuts staff by 6 percent, hitting business and news

Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:00pm EST

(Reuters) - Time Inc on Wednesday began the process of cutting about 500 jobs, about 6 percent of its total staff as the largest U.S. magazine publisher grapples with challenges beleaguering the print industry.

The layoffs mark the first major move made by Time Inc CEO Laura Lang, who joined the company in January 2012.

"With the significant and ongoing changes in our industry, we must continue to transform our company into one that is leaner, more nimble and more innately multi-platform," wrote Lang in a memo to employees. The memo, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters, disclosed the number of jobs affected on Wednesday.

The cuts will occur across the company, throughout both business division and newsrooms. In addition to its namesake weekly newsmagazine, Time Inc's publications include Sports Illustrated and People.

Lang called the reductions "painful," but said they were necessary in order "to create room for critical investments and new initiatives."

The staff cuts had been widely expected, though they are not as deep as the last round in 2008, when Time Inc slashed 600 jobs in response to the economic downturn.

Parent company Time Warner Inc in November reported that third-quarter revenue at Time Inc fell 6 percent to $838 million because of declines in subscription and advertising revenue. Time Warner is due to report fourth-quarter results next week.

(Reporting By Jennifer Saba in New York)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Propaganda outlets will find it increasingly difficult to get advertisers. When the message is one of control and conformity, it is highly unlikely that a consumer would consider advertising from such source as reliable. You know, if you survey stupid people, you can confirm your own beliefs as a manipulator, but you lose track of reality. Not to mention that people stupid enough to believe your lies are typically already over extended on their credit cards and incapable of spending on anything other than essentials, so your advertising is wasted on people with no money.

Jan 30, 2013 2:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BlueOkie wrote:
Keep the liberal slant and you’ll find out what happens, bankruptcy

Jan 30, 2013 5:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.