U.S. payroll tax hike seen hurting charitable giving: survey

NEW YORK Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:07am EST

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Charities that rely on donations from individuals should brace for lean times, with the U.S. payroll tax increase expected to curtail Americans' generosity, according to a poll released on Thursday.

One in five people questioned for the survey said they would reduce their charitable giving by an average of 29 percent because of the 2 percentage point tax increase, to 6.2 percent. The tax hike was part of the 11th-hour "fiscal cliff" deal negotiated in Washington and sealed on January 1.

More than a fifth, or 21 percent said they would not give to charities at all in the coming year, the survey conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for ChildFund International showed.

"The survey results suggest a challenging year ahead in what already has been a demanding fundraising climate," said Tereza Byrne, chief development officer of ChildFund International, a U.S.-based global child development non-profit agency. The group was formerly known as the Christian Children's Fund.

"If that comes to pass, it will likely have broad-reaching consequences across the non-profit landscape," she added.

Byrne called the anticipated cut in donations from one in five Americans "alarming," even though more than half, or 54 percent, said they did not plan to curtail their donations, while 6 percent expected to give more.

While most of the scheduled tax hikes and spending cuts under the "fiscal cliff" were avoided when Congress struck a deal, most U.S. workers saw their take-home salary diminished by the expiry of the 2 percentage-point cut in payroll taxes.

The survey showed that for half those surveyed, the most important factor for charitable giving was whether the money was being used appropriately and honestly. Only 14 percent said the most important thing was whether the charity reflected their personal values, while 7 percent cited a tax deduction as the primary motivation for giving.

The survey polled 1,012 adults online between January 10 and January 14 and was considered accurate to within plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

(Reporting by Chris Michaud; Editing by Patricia Reaney and Dan Grebler)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
morbas wrote:
Payrole tax can be eliminated with a fair national income taxe system,

-Start, copy paste and post your representative-
Poverty/subsistence margin flat rate of taxation is fairness. The upper quintile views fair as the more you make the more you take home. This meets both criteria. The Washington bureaucrats missed a big opportunity to propose a ‘margin flat rate tax’ that balances the budget. Rates $0-20K 0%, money above $20K 35%; couples freely share; all income bundled and taxed in summation form, no exemptions. And provide business relief with no business taxation with provisions on ‘partnership and disregarded’ businesses to transfer funds into personal accounts as the taxable income. Ends family business inheritance taxation, except when sold for personal profit (always taxable). The fiscal cliff resolution applies a higher 39.6% commoner rate accommodating a 20% capital gains gentile rate, and does not balance the budget. The ‘margin flat rate tax’ ($20k 35%) balances the budget eliminating all other taxes (payroll, gasoline, whatever…) with a lower 35% flat tax rate. And has a lower rate than the federal income single standard deduction form for under $200k level.
-End, copy paste and post your representative-

Our government founded as a republic through amendment evolved to a democratic republic, the public mandate has power. The ‘margin 0% $20k 35% rate’ provides $3.8 Trillion revenue. The 2011 national/state sum of incomes ($12.98 Trillion), used as a basis. The 35% flat rate extends to all taxpayers and generates a balanced budget revenue.

Jan 31, 2013 11:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures