Los Angeles Catholic archdiocese releases priest abuse files

LOS ANGELES Fri Feb 1, 2013 2:26am EST

1 of 3. Cardinal Roger Mahony (L) greets Archbishop Jose Gomez during the welcoming Mass marking the start of Coadjutor Archbishop Gomez's ministry in Los Angeles in this May 26, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Reed Saxon/Poo/Files

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles, after years of legal battles, released files on Thursday of priests accused of molesting children and removed a top clergyman who had been linked to efforts to conceal the abuse.

Archbishop Jose Gomez said he had stripped his predecessor, retired Cardinal Roger Mahony, of all public and administrative duties. Mahony's former top aide, Thomas Curry, stepped down as bishop of Santa Barbara.

"I find these files to be brutal and painful reading. The behavior described in these files is terribly sad and evil," Gomez said in a statement released by the nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.

"There is no excuse, no explaining away what happened to these children. The priests involved had the duty to be their spiritual fathers and they failed," he said.

A spokesman for a victims' support group said that the removal of Mahony and Curry was long overdue and a small step after the church spent years fighting to protect them.

"Hand-slapping Mahony is a nearly meaningless gesture," said David Clohessy, director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, or SNAP.

"When he had real power, and abused it horribly, he should have been demoted or disciplined by the church hierarchy, in Rome and in the U.S. But not a single Catholic cleric anywhere had the courage to even denounce him. Shame on them," he said.

The 12,000 pages of files were made public more than a week after church records relating to 14 priests were unsealed as part of a separate civil suit, showing that church officials plotted to conceal the molestation from law enforcement as late as 1987.

Those documents showed that Mahony, 76, and Curry, 70, his top adviser, both worked to send priests accused of abuse out of state to shield known molesters in the clergy from law enforcement scrutiny in the 1980s.


Mahony and Curry also tried to keep priests sent away to a Church-run pedophile treatment center from later revealing their misconduct to private therapists who would be obligated to report the crimes to police, the documents showed.

Among the documents released on Thursday was the personnel file of Father Jose Ugarte, which contains a 1993 letter to an archdiocese official from a man whose name was redacted and who wrote that Ugarte began sexually abusing him in 1983 when he was 17.

A document in the file says that in 1994, then-Archbishop Mahony and Ugarte reached an agreement requiring the Spanish priest to "leave the United States and take up permanent residence in Spain" and not to return without the express consent of the archbishop of Los Angeles for seven years. The final outcome in that case was not immediately clear.

Patrick Wall, 47, a former priest who is a consultant for plaintiffs and prosecutors in Catholic sex abuse cases, said the documents suggested that Mahony had been trying to avoid a public legal case against the priest.

"The important thing is those kinds of documents have never been produced before," Wall said.

Los Angeles prosecutors have said they will review and evaluate the documents, this batch of which includes 124 personnel files, 82 of which have information on allegations of sexual abuse, according to the archdiocese.

The Los Angeles archdiocese, which serves 4 million Catholics, reached a $660 million civil settlement in 2007 with more than 500 victims of child molestation in the biggest such agreement of its kind in the nation, and Mahony at the time called the abuse "a terrible sin and crime."

Victims' advocates have accused Church leaders of continuing to obfuscate their role in the scandal, and cite the newly released confidential letters and memos as a "smoking gun" proving complicity by Mahony and others.

(Reporting by Dan Whitcomb and Alex Dobuzinskis; Writing by Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
SNAPJudyJones wrote:
Finally the ugly truth is being exposed, finally the victims may feel validation, and finally these church officials might be held responsible for covering these sex crimes, so that no other child is sexually abused again.

But this is curious…..How is it possible that Cardinal Mahony ( who deserves to be prosecuted for covering up sex crimes against innocent kids ) can be removed of his duties.?….And yet convicted criminal KC Bishop Finn can not..?
They make up their own rules..
This is so sad for all the victims of clergy sex abuse..

Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, 636-433-2511. snapjudy@gmail.com,
(Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests)

Feb 01, 2013 2:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
jdl51 wrote:
“Mahony still holds the titles of Cardinal and Archbishop Emeritus of Los Angeles, and retains his Vatican appointments including his eligibility to vote in papal conclaves.

Apparently he’s still in good standing with the Vatican. No surprise there. The Church is still protecting their own to this day, and the man at the top was instrumental in protecting pedophiles himself, so I can see why they haven’t defrocked Mahony. You can’t hold yourself out as THE moral authority when you couldn’t, and can’t, even get this moral no brainer right. I might add that the diocese’s actions have come only after they were forced to reveal the records, even though they knew the contents for years. You might ask yourself why they didn’t act sooner.

Feb 01, 2013 11:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.