Postal Service will end Saturday mail delivery

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 6, 2013 4:17pm EST

1 of 3. Mail carrier Mike Perkins delivers mail in the snow in Waterloo, Iowa in this file photo taken December 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Matthew Putney/The Waterloo Courier/Handout

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Postal Service plans to drop Saturday delivery of first-class mail beginning the first week of August, a move that the financially struggling agency said will save $2 billion annually.

The Postal Service is cutting costs aggressively as it grows increasingly frustrated that Congress is dragging its feet in authorizing a structural overhaul that could stabilize the agency.

The agency, which lost $16 billion last year, has blamed much of its recent troubles on a 2006 law that requires it to make massive payments into its future retirees' healthcare fund, as well as on reduced mail volumes as Americans increasingly turn to email and online communications rather than dropping a stamped letter in a postal box.

Some experts have previously estimated that the Postal Service could run out of cash by October.

However, ending Saturday mail delivery will not significantly stop the financial bleeding, and some critics said the move could backfire if customers become irritated by an erosion in service.

According to the plan, the mail agency will still deliver packages and prescription drugs six days a week and will not change post office operating hours. But it will not deliver direct mail or magazines.

The announcement comes just weeks after the USPS board of governors directed the agency to accelerate cost-cutting measures rather than wait "indefinitely" for legislation.

"The Postal Service is advancing an important new approach to delivery that reflects the strong growth of our package business and responds to the financial realities resulting from America's changing mailing habits," Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said in a statement.

The 237-year-old institution ran up against its legal borrowing limit last year and defaulted twice on required payments to the federal government.

Postal officials have said for years that the agency needed to cut back on delivery days, as well as close underused facilities and reduce its workforce.

Lawmakers spent more than a year on postal legislation, including proposals to eliminate Saturday delivery, but were unable to agree on a bill.

"The choice is either changes to some of the services or raise prices, and people don't want prices raised," Donahoe said at a press conference.

Officials previously contended they needed permission from Congress to make the changes, but now believe they may be able to take some actions without new legislation.


No law requires that the Postal Service deliver mail six days a week, but Congress has included a provision in legislation to fund the federal government each year that has prevented the USPS from reducing delivery service. The current funding measure expires in March, and would free the Postal Service to change its delivery schedule unless Congress prohibits it in the next spending resolution.

The Postal Service is already facing some resistance to making delivery schedule changes without permission from Congress.

"Today's announcement by Postmaster General Donahoe to eliminate six-day delivery is yet another death knell for the quality service provided by the U.S. Postal Service," said Jeanette Dwyer, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association.

Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives' Oversight Committee, said delivery frequency should be determined by legislation "rather than through arbitrary action by the Postal Service."

But Representative Darrell Issa of California and Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, both Republicans, called the change a common-sense move and noted President Barack Obama has supported allowing the Postal Service to move to five-day delivery.

Trade organizations that have a stake in Saturday mail deliveries such as the Greeting Card Association and National Association of Letter Carriers also expressed their disappointment.

George White, president of the Greeting Card Association, said the organization is concerned that this will drive down the number of greeting cards sent. More than 60 percent of greeting cards are delivered through the Postal Service, he said.

"Eliminating Saturday service is short-sighted and self-defeating. There are much better alternatives that will lead to a stronger Postal Service, without significantly and negatively impacting the citizen mailer," White said.

NALC president Fredric Rolando, said the plan was disastrous and would harm small businesses, rural communities, the elderly and the disabled. "We call for the immediate removal of the postmaster general, who has lost the confidence of the men and women who deliver for America every day," Rolando said via email.

Donahoe said the changes would allow the Postal Service to continue benefiting from the growing package delivery business as Americans order more products from websites such as eBay Inc and Inc.

Package deliveries were a bright spot in a bleak 2012 fiscal year, with package revenue rising 8.7 percent during the year.

(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey; Editing by Vicki Allen, Leslie Gevirtz, Karey Wutkowski and Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (40)
Dragos111 wrote:
This is so typical of anything associated with our government. Times get tough and revenues are down. The new plan is to raise prices and cut services. If this were some true government entity, they could do that. The government has taxing authority where they can simply tell us to pay more taxes. The USPS is not such an entity.

The USPS cannot force us to pay higher prices and to accept lesser services. They actually have to compete against other companies. When a private company falls on hard times they first look inside to see where they can cut costs. Then they look at what they can change so they can lower their prices and/or improve their services. They wind up COMPETING better.

The USPS is doing just the opposite. They are raising their prices while cutting services. They are at a point where the higher they raise their prices the less business they do and the less money they bring in. They need to run themselves like a real business, not like a government agency. They have to compete for the business.

Feb 06, 2013 8:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
It’s about time. So unnecessary.

Feb 06, 2013 9:00am EST  --  Report as abuse
MetalHead8 wrote:
sucks for me

Dragos, well put sir

Feb 06, 2013 9:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.