NATO's Afghanistan force gets new U.S. commander

KABUL Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:42pm EST

Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford testifies at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in Washington, November 15, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford testifies at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in Washington, November 15, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - The U.S. Marine Corps general who will oversee the withdrawal of most foreign troops from Afghanistan and wind down America's longest war took command of NATO-led forces on Sunday at a change-of-command ceremony that emphasized Afghan sovereignty.

General Joseph Dunford took charge of the International Security Assistance Force from Marine Corps General John Allen, who ended a 19-month tour that was arguably one of the most difficult periods in the war, now in its 11th year.

"Today is not about change, it's about continuity. What has not changed is the will of this coalition ... What has not changed is the inevitability of our success," Dunford told a crowd of foreign and Afghan officials in an aging gymnasium at the barricaded ISAF headquarters.

Senior military officials, including Dunford and Allen, sat on a dais covered with an Afghan rug as a band played the U.S. and Afghan national anthems and a color guard presented the flags. Several hundred guests were seated in chairs on the floor of the old basketball court.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai was absent from the ceremony despite receiving an invitation from ISAF. A spokesman for Karzai declined to comment. General Martin Dempsey, the highest-ranking U.S. military officer, said later he thought the level of Afghan representation at the ceremony was appropriate.

Allen, who directed ISAF's transfer of most security across the country to the Afghan army and police, gave an emotional speech stressing the nation's sovereignty, an issue that has been a thorn in Karzai's relationship with his Western backers.

Located between Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia, Afghanistan has been subject to invasions since the ancient Greeks, through to the 19th-century "Great Game" - the scramble for power between Britain and Russia - and the last three decades of conflict.

Citing international support for a transformative decade in Afghanistan, Allen said: "I believe that in 10 years, Afghanistan will never again be a place between empires, caught in the grindstone of international politics."

AFGHANS TAKE THE LEAD

Dunford assumes control of ISAF at a time when the 350,000-strong Afghan military and police forces have taken over the lead role for security across most of the country, and are due to be fully in the lead everywhere within a few months. ISAF's primary role will be to assist, advise and train Afghan forces.

Allen and Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the challenge for Dunford through the end of 2014 would be to balance the withdrawal of international forces with the continuing need to assist and train Afghan troops, all while pressuring al Qaeda.

"Closing bases, moving equipment - if you're not careful, that can become the mission," Dempsey said. "So he's got to keep all those things in equilibrium."

Allen said the Afghan army and police were becoming ever more capable.

"Afghan forces defending Afghan people and enabling the government of this country to serve its citizens. This is victory. This is what winning looks like," Allen said.

Officials said that, while the insurgency remains a challenge, dealing with government corruption increasingly poses the biggest threat to Afghanistan's long-term viability.

"The strategic long-term enduring threat, it's not the insurgency. It is the degree of corruption and criminality that exists within the government," a senior ISAF official said on condition of anonymity. "If you can deal (with that) ... then you can start ... pulling the carpet out from underneath the insurgency."

Allen told reporters he thought Karzai had put in place the mechanisms to deal with corruption, but added: "We've reached a point now where rhetoric, while it was encouraging, isn't enough any more ...

"The rhetoric has to be accompanied by real and meaningful reform, reform that reduces the capacity of the criminal patronage networks to grip and weaken institutions of state."

Allen also said education was helping to turn the tide of public opinion in Afghanistan against Taliban insurgents, who banned girls from most schools. He earlier told Reuters that advancing women's rights was key to preventing the Islamist group regaining support.

The White House said last month it would nominate Allen as NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, after the Pentagon cleared him of professional misconduct over emails to a Florida socialite linked to a scandal that led his predecessor, David Petraeus, to resign as director of the CIA.

(Writing by Amie Ferris-Rotman; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
1XslaveUSA wrote:
If not for Afghan soil being rich in valuable minerals and the need to build Natural Gas pipelines for UNOCAL the U.S. would not still be in Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden has been martyred and al-Qaeda no longer has a presence there, yet U.S. troops (and contractors) are still being killed and injured needlessly. The Iraqi and Afghan wars have cost the U.S. billions of dollars ($1,423,000,000,000) and destroyed the nation’s economy yet the Afghan war continues only to the profit of big business and the military-industrial complex (which Dwight D. Eisenhower famously warned us about). The U.S. taxpayer monies being flushed down the toilet which is Afghanistan ($612,000,000,000) could be better spent here in this country on education, health care, infrastructure (refurbishing the nation’s highways, roads, bridges and rail lines) and the hiring (or re-hiring) of state and municipal workers. The great irony with Afghanistan is that there are plans in place for including the Taliban in the future governance of the country, thusly making the sacrifice of U.S. blood and treasure for naught. When will Americans wise-up and demand an end to the Bush & Obama neo- Crusader imperialist misadventure in Afghanistan?

Feb 10, 2013 1:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Doc62 wrote:
I mostly agree with 1XslaveUSA. Karzai has been trying to work out a deal with the Taliban, who FIRST want us out of Afganistan. We have enriched our corporate military machine far too much.
However, the Bush clan got us into this mess with phoney WMD and American sympathy from 9/11.
Obama got us out of Iraq & getting us out of Afganistan. He kept us out of Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria. Call him a “dove”, I call him smart. On behalf of our children(soldiers) thank you Mr President.

Feb 10, 2013 3:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AZ1811 wrote:
Karzai won’t last a month after we leave. He’ll take his millions and go to some European country and live well. He doesn’t even take the time to attend the ceremony of the last losing General to save his butt. If this is victory, I hate to see what losing looks like.

Feb 10, 2013 6:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus