Ten Afghan "civilians" killed in NATO airstrike

KUNAR, Afghanistan Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:49am EST

Related Topics

KUNAR, Afghanistan (Reuters) - A NATO airstrike killed 10 Afghan civilians, including five children, in eastern Afghanistan on Wednesday, local officials said, a toll that if confirmed is likely to raise tension between President Hamid Karzai's government and U.S.-led NATO forces.

The strike, in the Shigal district of Kunar province, was confirmed by NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), though a spokesman said it could not confirm civilian casualties.

"Foreign forces carried out the attack by themselves without informing us," Kunar Governor Fazlullah Wahidi told Reuters.

Four Taliban fighters were also killed in the strike and five civilians wounded, he said.

The strike occurred in the village of Chawgam and the 10 dead civilians were from two local families, Wahidi said.

A spokesman for ISAF, Major Adam Wojack, said he was aware of an incident which "matched" the report from Kunar, but he could not confirm casualty numbers.

"We take all allegations of civilian casualties seriously and we are currently assessing the incident to determine more facts," Wojack said.

ISAF regularly states that it has reduced civilian casualties in recent years, and that the insurgents are now responsible for 84 per cent of all such deaths and injuries.

The airstrike came within hours of U.S. President Barack Obama's declaration that he would be withdrawing half the U.S. troops in Afghanistan - 34,000 - by the end of this year.

That would be followed by further troop withdrawals next year which would lead to the end of the U.S. war in Afghanistan, he said.

(Reporting by Mohammad Anwar; Writing by Mirwais Harooni, Dylan Welch; Editing by Nick Macfie)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
I like how Reuters puts “civilians” in the quotations marks, as though the children killed weren’t really civilians but future terrorist…

By the same token, al-Qaeda should suppose to that American children are future imperialist stormtroopers and kill them mercilessly…

Hey, what’s good for the goose is good for ther gander!

Feb 13, 2013 3:23am EST  --  Report as abuse
Bos-Mike wrote:
Who is writing your news? An ex-Nazi, or an illiterate moron that doesn’t use when quotation marks supposed to be used. Why is ‘civilians’ in quotes? Or is every body in Afghanistan is a legitimate military target and no civilians exist. I wouldn’t like it if the rest of the media put our military as ‘soldiers’

Feb 13, 2013 4:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
Putting “Civilians” on quotes is more proof of Reuter’s growing Right-Wing Bias. It’s still children, in any event, and NATO has no business killing ANY children.

Feb 13, 2013 5:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus