Senate Democrats pave way for full Senate vote on Hagel

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:32pm EST

Former U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) testifies during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on his nomination to be Defense Secretary, on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 31, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Former U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) testifies during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on his nomination to be Defense Secretary, on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 31, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Democrats filed a motion on Wednesday to end debate on the nomination of Chuck Hagel as President Barack Obama's new secretary of defense, setting up a showdown vote by Friday.

Democrats are expected to muster the 60 votes needed in the 100-member chamber to clear a Republican procedural roadblock, clearing the way for a vote on his confirmation.

Once the roadblock is cleared, Hagel is expected to win the simple majority of Senate votes he needs to be confirmed.

Democrats control 55 seats in the Senate and none has come out against Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska who has faced fierce opposition from members of his own party.

Some Republicans have raised questions about whether Hagel, 66, was sufficiently supportive of Israel, tough enough on Iran or capable of leading the Pentagon.

At least two of the 45 Republicans in the chamber have said they would vote for Hagel's confirmation, and several others have said they would not support a procedural tactic to block or delay a vote.

Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic leader, filed the motion to end debate after Republicans refused to give unanimous consent to allow a vote on Hagel's confirmation.

"It's the first time in the history of our country that a presidential nominee for secretary of defense has been filibustered," Reid said. "What a shame. But, that's the way it is."

After more than two hours of often intense debate, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 14-11 along party lines on Tuesday to advance Hagel's nomination to succeed Leon Panetta as the civilian leader at the Pentagon.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting By Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Sandra Maler and Eric Beech)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
justinolcb wrote:
Na… there’s your vote!

Feb 13, 2013 4:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
saavedra wrote:
Thank God, let’s stop this mind-numbing gridlock. There are bad guys out there and we need someone like Hagel–as opposed to a grandstanding chicken hawk or a bitter presidential loser–to run the Pentagon.
Obama won the last election by 4.5 million votes. Dems took additional Senate seats and closed the gap in the House. Republican obfuscation and Tea Party tactics need to cease or the Repubs will be reduced to a hand-full of Septa–and Octogenarian WASPS and Jesuit janglers.

Feb 13, 2013 7:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
saavedra wrote:
Thank God, let’s stop this mind-numbing gridlock. There are bad guys out there and we need someone like Hagel–as opposed to a grandstanding chicken hawk or a bitter presidential loser–to run the Pentagon.
Obama won the last election by 4.5 million votes. Dems took additional Senate seats and closed the gap in the House. Republican obfuscation and Tea Party tactics need to cease or the Repubs will be reduced to a hand-full of Septa–and Octogenarian WASPS and Jesuit janglers.

Feb 13, 2013 7:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.