Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Influential short-seller warns of bubble in 3D printers

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:21pm EST

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Shares of companies that sell 3D printers fell on Thursday after Citron Research said they were vastly overvalued and that the technology, highlighted this week by U.S. President Barack Obama, has been hyped.

Makers of 3D printers in recent years have turned an evolving technology used by manufacturers for over two decades toward consumers, offering the prospect of producing everything from toys to tools in the home, and sending their share prices soaring.

Citron Research, run by California-based investor and notable short-seller Andrew Left, issued a report on Thursday accusing 3D Systems' Chief Executive Abe Reichental of exaggerating advances in 3D printing and contributing to a bubble in the shares of 3D printing companies.

"Appearances have become completely unhinged from reality when it comes to the mania created in so-called '3D Printing' stocks, and 3D Systems in particular," Citron Research said. "Behind every good bubble there is a good promoter, in this case we have the best in Abe Reichental."

Shares of 3D Systems Corporation, the biggest listed U.S. 3D printer maker, fell. So did shares of Stratasys and ExOne.

Citron Research focuses on stocks it believes have been fraudulently and intentionally overvalued. It said 3D Systems has made no significant advances in 3D printing technology in the past five years and that it has recently rehashed consumer products with little change.

Rock Hill, South Carolina-based 3D Systems and Stratasys declined to comment.

REVOLUTIONARY?

Also known as additive manufacturing, 3D printing creates solid objects from a digital model by laying down successive thin layers of material. Under the traditional "subtractive" approach, objects are created by cutting them out of a solid chunk of metal or plastic.

In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Obama pointed to 3D printing as a technology for manufacturing innovation and said it "has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost anything."

Shares of 3D printer stocks rallied the next day.

Leading-edge 3D printers are finding new roles in manufacturing, for example, to create product prototypes and other kinds of one-off production.

Companies such as General Electric Co plan to use 3D printing to build lightweight aircraft parts. Dentists use it to create crowns in the space of an hour instead of two weeks.

But today's consumer-level 3D printers can produce little more than egg holders, combs and plastic sex toys, Citron Research said.

Shares of 3D Systems have tripled over the past 12 months and recently traded at more than 42 times the company's expected 12-month earnings.

Shares of Stratasys have almost doubled over the past 12 months. Its stock was recently priced at 39 times expected earnings.

After Citron's report, 3D Systems closed down 4.36 percent at $62.75 and Stratasys ended 6.08 percent lower at $71.20. ExOne closed down 2.96 percent at $27.18.

(Reporting By Noel Randewich; Editing by Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Speaking with some solid understanding of this field, there is undoubtedly too much hype out there. The future of this technology is extremely bright, but at least two fundamental barriers must be breached. First, the software tools for designing (modeling) 3D objects must be greatly improved. Right now, the modeling process of anything but the simplest objects is very difficult and time consuming. Secondly, and more importantly, the materials that 3D printers use must be greatly improved to meet the standard people expect of most manufactured goods. This demands critical advancements in chemical and materials engineering, completely unrelated to digital technology.

Feb 15, 2013 3:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bunker555 wrote:
Although hardware costs have come down, it still takes some expertise to design the final product. 3D printing will achieve minimal mass market penetration, however, in industrial, medical, and design applications, people will enjoy enormous cost and time savings

Feb 17, 2013 4:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.