Japan defense chief: could have pre-emptive strike ability in future

TOKYO Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:30am EST

1 of 3. Japan's Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera speaks during an interview with Reuters at the Defence Ministry in Tokyo February 14, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Issei Kato

Related Topics

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan has the right to develop the ability to make a pre-emptive strike against an imminent attack given a changing security environment although it has no plan to do so now, the defense minister said on Thursday, days after North Korea conducted a third nuclear test.

Any sign that Japan was moving to develop such a capability in response to North Korea's nuclear program could upset neighbors China and South Korea, which have reacted strongly in the past to suggestions it might do so.

"When an intention to attack Japan is evident, the threat is imminent, and there are no other options, Japan is allowed under the law to carry out strikes against enemy targets," Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera told Reuters in an interview.

"Given Japan's political environment and the peace-oriented diplomacy it has observed, this is not the time to make preparations (for building such capability).

"But we need to carefully observe the changing security environment in the region."

North Korea conducted its third nuclear test on Tuesday, drawing condemnation from the United States, Japan, Europe and the North's only major ally, China.

Onodera said Japan needed to strengthen its ballistic missile defense in view of the North Korean threat.

"Japan, the United States and South Korea managed to respond well to North Korea's missile launch on December 12. But North Korea is expected to boost various capabilities further. We need to improve corresponding capabilities as well."

But he declined to say whether it was more urgent than ever to lift a self-imposed ban on exercising the right of collective self-defense, or coming to the aid of an ally under attack.

Exercising that right is now prohibited under a long-standing interpretation of Japan's pacifist constitution but Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has made clear he wants to lift the ban and a panel of advisers has begun discussing the topic.


Onodera called on China to join the United States, Japan and other countries in tightening sanctions against North Korea, noting that Pyongyang had gone ahead with the test on Tuesday in defiance of Beijing's urging not to.

"I think China is the one that is most concerned about the development ... From now on, it is necessary for us, including China, to seek effective steps, effective economic measures (against North Korea)."

Onodera urged China to work with Japan to set up hotline and other communications channels between Tokyo and Beijing to prevent any accidental clash over disputed East China Sea islets, while reiterating that the islands belonged to Japan.

Sino-Japanese ties cooled sharply after Japan's government in September nationalized three of the disputed islets, called the Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

The island row has escalated to the point where both sides have scrambled fighter jets while patrol ships shadow each other, raising worries that an unintended collision or other incident could lead to a broader clash.

"There already is a preliminary agreement between Japan and China to set up a maritime communication mechanism," Onodera said.

"The mechanism would include annual meetings, specialists' meetings, hotlines between high-ranking people, and direct communications between ships and planes in the field. I would like to have final agreement reached as soon as possible."

Onodera said last week a Chinese frigate had locked its targeting radar on a Japanese destroyer on January 30 - a step that usually precedes the firing of weapons - but China insisted that its vessel used only ordinary surveillance radar.

He said in the interview that Japan has data to back up its assertion, but was cautious about disclosing the information.

"We have irrefutable data. But (disclosure) would also reveal our various capabilities. We would like to discuss (possible disclosure) within the government, while watching China's future steps."

(Editing by Linda Sieg and Robert Birsel)

(This Feb. 14 story was corrected to fix date of nuclear test to Tuesday from Monday in the eleventh paragraph)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Free_Pacific wrote:
Janeallen wrote: “The evidence that Japan is faking incidents just like the Mukden– they are being actively covered up by the media, big time. ”

You mean like locking fire control radar on Japanese vessels, to create a situation when China can launch a war? Fortunately, the Japanese did not take the bait. But it will land a nasty PR blow to China. We now see more clearly the situation China is engineering and not just with Japan, but with The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei… All under the guise of Chinese ‘historical rights’, AKA pure nationalism. We have seen it before, we will see it again and we are seeing it now.

Feb 16, 2013 10:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
HagiMaraphali wrote:
Janeallen wrote: “Japan is declaring: we’ll attack, and fabricate data that we are merely responding, just like the way we started WWI WWII, the invasion of Taiwan, of Korea, of Manchuria”.

The build up to World War One started in Europe with the killing in Sarajevo of the Arch-Duke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg on 28 June 1914. History books record World War Two as starting on September 1st 1939, again in Europe, when Germany invaded Poland. Unless I am reading an incorrect map, Japan is not a country in Europe. Japan joined in both wars, firstly in WW1 as an ally of Britian and the in WW2 as an ally of Germany.

Feb 17, 2013 7:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.