British shoppers may pay high price from horsemeat scandal

LONDON Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:33am EST

People shop at a supermarket in London February 16, 2013. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

People shop at a supermarket in London February 16, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

LONDON (Reuters) - For Britons worried last week's beef lasagne was in fact a helping of horse, peace of mind that such a meal will never reach dining tables again may come at a price.

Livestock specialists say that contrary to some public comments by supermarkets, ensuring a chain of quality from farm to table will cost money - particularly at the cheaper, ready-made meal end.

"How can you supply a meal for two people for a pound," said Andrew Hyde, managing director of British meat supplier Traymoor.

"I know what things cost and I know that if I was to put six ounces of quality mincemeat into a lasagne or a cottage pie then I would have to charge twice that price," he said.

The horsemeat scandal, which has triggered product recalls across Europe and damaged confidence in the food industry, erupted last month when tests in Ireland revealed some beef products sold there and in Britain contained equine DNA.

The British government has come under pressure to act and to explain lapses in quality control. Supermarkets, catering and restaurant firms, as well as food manufacturers, are battling to restore consumer confidence amid a welter of lurid headlines playing on a popular British queasiness about eating horsemeat.

Although Tesco, Britain's biggest retailer, has said raising standards "doesn't mean more expensive food," many in the meat industry are not convinced.

"Producing high quality, fully traceable, high welfare standard livestock costs money to put on peoples' tables," said Peter Garbutt, chief livestock adviser for Britain's farmers union, the NFU.

He said consumers had to be more realistic.

Lawmakers are expected to respond to the scandal with further regulation to ensure an ongoing regime of product testing, quality assurance and policing of standards.

With DNA testing costing up to 500 pounds ($770) per sample, creating a robust regime will not come cheap.


Analysts reckon value lines, such as frozen beefburgers or spaghetti bolognese ready-meals, are currently so cheap and profit margins so thin that supermarkets have little room for manoeuvre.

They say that spells increased margin pressure for already squeezed suppliers and price rises for consumers.

"I don't think there's any way that we can escape the viewpoint that the price of having guaranteed food in terms of it contains what it says it contains is ultimately higher prices," said Neil Saunders of retail research agency Conlumino.

"We might be speaking about a couple of pence on an item, because this is a game about volume."

That would add to food price inflation, already running at 4.9 percent in the 12 weeks to January 20 as a result of high commodity prices, according to market researcher Kantar, causing a further squeeze on the budgets of shoppers reeling from meager wage rises and government austerity measures.

That is a scenario lawmakers fear.

"The consumer cannot be left to face a Catch-22 where they can either pay for food that complies with the highest standards of traceability, labeling and testing, or accept that they cannot trust the provenance and composition of the foods they eat," said Anne McIntosh, a legislator who chairs the cross-party Food and Rural Affairs Committee, which published a report into the scandal last week.

Food experts say globalization has helped the food industry grow, but has also created a vast system which has fuelled the risk of adulteration.

Mark Price, managing director of upmarket British grocer Waitrose, told Reuters the horsemeat scandal was the inevitable result of big grocers putting pressure on suppliers.

"If you have a competition that says: Who can sell the cheapest stuff? Inevitably at a point in time you will get something like this," he said.

Two Competition Commission investigations have cleared supermarkets of unduly pressuring suppliers.

Tesco CEO Philip Clarke said on Friday he had ordered a review of the firm's approach to its supply chain. He wants relationships with its suppliers to become more "transparent and collaborative".

Co-operative Group CEO Peter Marks similarly spoke of taking a closer look at its supply chain.

Meanwhile, although the horsemeat scandal has undermined grocers' relationship with customers, investors appear unperturbed.

Last week, the height of the crisis, shares in Britain's food retail sector rose 1.2 percent. So far this year the sector is up 6.2 percent.

($1 = 0.6460 British pounds)

(Editing by Jeremy Gaunt.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
Renox wrote:
Blaming the customers for being duped?
First the Banking scam, Government lies, and now the Food Industry’s rip off. They sell you garbage and you have to eat it whether you like it or not? I don’t think so!
In the past 20 years, Corporate giants took control of European Agriculture. They bought up everything, literally putting small farmers out of business. The slogans touted by the Media were “cheap, quality food” were all lies. Regulators were bribed, so effectively there was no regulation. Millions of people gobbled down the same processed food stuff for decades, and suddenly somebody came up with the idea of TESTING? This should have been done on a regular basis, it is called quality control.
But the Tescos and Safeways wanted more profit, so they did not care what was in the product.
It does not have to be this way. The key is: local producers, small farming and QUALITY food. Their prices were expensive BECAUSE they could not compete with they supermarkets. Once people STOP shopping in supermarkets, local producers will have enough business to make their prices reasonable again.

Feb 19, 2013 12:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Fillybuster wrote:
IMHO, Just get rid of the middle-men. Manufacturers might want to deal directly with the abbatoirs (sp?). Simplifies paper work and quality control, and cuts costs.

Feb 19, 2013 12:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.