UPDATE 1-U.S. ethanol groups decry EU tariff as 'blatant protectionism'

Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:37pm EST

Related News

WASHINGTON Feb 19 (Reuters) - Two biofuels trade groups on Tuesday lambasted a European Union decision to impose an anti-dumping duty on U.S.-made ethanol as a protectionist move and said they would challenge the tariff "in every manner possible."

The 9.5 percent tariff on imports of U.S. ethanol was approved on Monday by the Council of the European Union. The imports were worth more than $930 million, or 700 million euros, a year.

"This is blatant protectionism at its worst," trade groups Renewable Fuels Association and Growth Energy said in a joint statement. They said the country-wide duty hitting all U.S. producers was not based on facts.

"We will challenge this policy in every manner possible," the U.S. groups said.

EU officials say the anti-dumping duty, which is expected to take effect by the end of the week, is needed because U.S. ethanol is sold in the EU at illegally low prices.

The case was brought by the EU ethanol industry association ePure, whose members produce 80 percent of Europe's bioethanol.

The European Commission, the EU's executive body, proposed the 9.5 percent duty last month.

A U.S. trade official on Tuesday echoed the U.S. industry groups' concerns.

"The U.S. is disappointed with this move by the EU, and we continue to have serious concerns about a number of procedural and methodological irregularities that took place during the final stages of the investigation," the official said.

U.S. ethanol production is down sharply due to record-high corn prices and weak domestic demand for gasoline. At recent rates of production, output could be 8 percent below the U.S. target for use.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
braytjr wrote:
In that case, we should lift the tariffs on Brazilian ethanol coming into the United States.

Feb 20, 2013 2:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.