Spy agencies scrounge for details on North Korean nuclear test

WASHINGTON/SEOUL Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:44pm EST

A North Korean flag on a tower flutters in the wind at a North Korean village near the truce village of Panmunjom in the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas in this picture taken just south of the border, in Paju, north of Seoul, February 15, 2013. REUTERS/Lee Jae-Won

A North Korean flag on a tower flutters in the wind at a North Korean village near the truce village of Panmunjom in the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas in this picture taken just south of the border, in Paju, north of Seoul, February 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Lee Jae-Won

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. and allied spy agencies have found no traces of telltale nuclear-related particles from North Korea's February 12 nuclear bomb test, leaving unresolved basic questions about the device's design, according to officials in the United States, Europe and South Korea.

This lack of scientific evidence suggests that key questions may remain unanswered about the type of fissile material used in the test, which was detected by seismic sensors. It also leaves unaddressed questions about how far the North has advanced in its bomb design.

After the test, the U.S. Air Force Technical Applications Center in Florida dispatched WC-135 "sniffer" airplanes to look for traces of gas residue that could offer clues to the device's design, but those efforts apparently turned up empty, the officials said.

An Air Force spokesperson confirmed that the planes were dispatched but said no results from the missions could be released. A U.S. intelligence official said analysis from the tests "was continuing."

Based on seismic evidence, both officials and private experts say there is little doubt that the North Korean device was several times more powerful than those tested in 2006 and 2009.

While estimates of the explosive power of the latest test vary widely, most officials and experts estimate it was at least five kilotons, which is smaller than the power of the atomic bomb the United States dropped on Hiroshima in World War Two.

In a statement about the test issued through its official news agency, North Korea declared that it had used "a miniaturized and lighter nuclear device with greater explosive force than previously (and which) did not pose any negative impact on the surrounding ecological environment."

One critical question is what kind of fissile material North Korea used in the latest test.

In the two earlier tests, North Korea is believed to have used plutonium as the fissile core of its test devices.

Following international diplomatic pressure, North Korea in 2007 abandoned plutonium production. But it later acknowledged that it had built facilities to produce highly enriched uranium, another fissile material that can be used in bombs.

While plutonium is a by-product of nuclear reactors, experts say it can be difficult to build a bomb using the material because specifications have to be precise. Experts say it would be easy for North Korea to make large, if not almost unlimited, quantities of highly enriched uranium.

'MAY NOT FIND ANYTHING'

Absent the trace evidence that might have been collected by sniffer planes - and without leaked information from within the North Korean testing program - U.S. and allied officials said it would be very difficult for outsiders to determine whether the latest test involved a plutonium or uranium core.

Other key issues include precisely how powerful the device was, how it was configured and how far the North Koreans have advanced in miniaturizing a device they might eventually deploy on long-range ballistic missiles that have been under development.

Officials and experts familiar with the capabilities of sniffer planes said that over the years the North Koreans have become increasingly effective at burying and sealing their tests sites to conceal even the faintest scientific traces.

"History would teach us that the North Koreans do like to hide their secret activities and control the message," said David Albright, a private nuclear expert who has visited North Korea and talked with officials about its nuclear program.

A European national security official said the North Koreans were becoming "very effective" at hiding evidence that would offer clues to its nuclear secrets.

A South Korean official knowledgeable about the February 12 test said that most likely the North Koreans dug a test tunnel deeply and sealed it tightly to prevent detection.

"The most plausible point is the structure of the pit was made so that it wasn't a straight line that opened to the outside, but had multiple turns and also many intercepting blockades," he said.

"We need to remember that this is deep in the mountains (where) they tested that are formed of heavy rocks, not out in flat, exposed area," the official said, adding: "We may not find anything."

South Korean, U.S. and European officials all noted that the trace materials sometimes decay rapidly - in the case of highly enriched uranium within a couple of days after an explosion. The longer no traces are found, the less likely that any traces will be found.

Although "there is still some time left, the chances of finding anything is getting lower and lower," the South Korean official said.

(Additional reporting by David Chance; Editing by Marilyn W. Thompson and Eric Beech)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
MikeBarnett wrote:
Both answers are correct. The North Koreans are making better nuclear weapons and better underground test facilities to contain the blasts. North Korea is wisely preparing for conflict with the US that the US has threatened since 2002.

The US overthrew the Taliban in late 2001, but that was expected after 9-11. In January of 2002, Bush said Iraq, Iran, and North Korea were an “Axis of Evil.” In 2003, the Bush regime illegally invaded Iraq and removed Saddam over WMD’s that didn’t exist, and the US began lies about Iran’s ties to 9-11 and WMD’s that didn’t exist. Kim Jong-il wisely began developing nuclear weapons and the missiles to hit the US. He detonated the 1st nuclear weapon in 2006 and the 2nd in 2009 because Obama continued pressure on Iran, the 2nd US war crime in the “Axis of Evil” plan.

Recent US efforts suggest war with Iran in the summer of 2013, so Kim Jong-un prepares for nuclear or thermonuclear war with the US. The nuclear war would use missiles, 20 pods, and 120 multiple independent strike units with 120 nuclear warheads to hit 120 US cities. There may not be time for the nuclear option, so a thermonuclear attack with a super high yield device may be needed. Most thermonuclear weapons have a single nuclear device to ignite the thermonuclear fuel, but, at a certain point, the nuclear device’s fuel reaches critical mass and detonates, blowing away the remaining thermonuclear fuel before complete ignition of all thermonuclear fuel has occurred. This gives an efficiency of only 0.008%. Using 4 nuclear devices, arranged in a pyramidal pattern around the thermonuclear fuel and detonated simultaneously, would increase the thermonuclear yield by a factor of 12,500. A standard 10 megaton device would become a 125,000 megaton device that would incinerate the continental US, southern Canada, and northern Mexico. Most US retaliatory strike forces would be destroyed, and the US would have only submarine missiles that would not cause as much harm to North Korea as the US suffers. So North Korea would “win” the war.

Feb 20, 2013 6:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
tweety656 wrote:
Hey mike, Are you for real? North Korea has very little nuclear material that could be use for a device that you suggest. I think they better go back to practicing their goose step.

Feb 20, 2013 7:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
logicdog wrote:
I think Mike’s been at the Plutonium again. . .

125,000 megatons? Only in your dreams. . .

Feb 20, 2013 8:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures