Obama expresses doubt about a March 1 deal to head off cuts

WASHINGTON Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:20pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama talks against automatic budget cuts scheduled to take effect next week, while in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex in Washington February 19, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama talks against automatic budget cuts scheduled to take effect next week, while in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex in Washington February 19, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama expressed doubt on Thursday that a deal can be struck with Republican lawmakers by a March 1 deadline to head off the start of $85 billion in spending cuts.

His comments, made in an interview with radio talk show host Al Sharpton, suggested the White House was preparing for the possibility the March 1 deadline will pass with no deal.

That would set off a chain reaction of automatic spending cuts that if left unchecked over the next few months could lead to thousands of job furloughs.

Republican lawmakers who control the House of Representatives are solidly against Obama's proposal to raise money for deficit reduction by eliminating tax loopholes. Obama is insistent that any deal to avert the spending cuts must include ways to raise revenues so deep cuts in social programs are avoided.

"At this point, we continue to reach out to Republicans and say this is not going to be good for the economy, it's not going to be good for ordinary people. But I don't know if they're going to move and that's what we're going to have to keep pushing over the next seven, eight days," Obama told Sharpton.

Obama spoke by phone on Thursday to House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, the top Republican in Washington, and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.

"Whether or not we can move Republicans at this point to do the right thing is what we're still trying to gauge," he told Sharpton.

If no deal is reached by March 1, and it seems unlikely one will be, attention will immediately turn to a March 27 deadline when a stopgap funding bill expires and a new measure would need to be negotiated to keep the government running.

The longer the dispute drags on, the more likely the other legislative priorities of the president, like gun control and an immigration overhaul, will be delayed.

"I'd like to get as much stuff done as quickly as possible," Obama said on Wednesday in an interview with KGO-TV, a local affiliate of ABC News in San Francisco.

"Even though I'm just starting my second term, I know that ... once we get through this year, then people start looking at the midterms (elections). And after that, they start thinking about presidential elections."

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (82)
Bubba311 wrote:
Who is to blame for this conundrum? The debate will go on, but one thing is clear: this almost certainly would not have happened under any other President.

Feb 20, 2013 8:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
beech wrote:
Time to hit the IGNORE button.

Feb 20, 2013 8:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
trashcongress wrote:
All congressmen/women and assemblymen/women should be furloughed like any other federal staffs. Why they are being paid the big bugs and good benefits just sitting around. In real world, they should have no immune what so ever. Their arguments are straightly child play and non-productive.

Feb 20, 2013 8:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.