UPDATE 1-Embraer bests Beechcraft for Afghan plane order

Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:49pm EST

Related Topics

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON Feb 27 (Reuters) - Brazil's Embraer bested U.S.-based Beechcraft in a high-stakes U.S. Air Force recompetition for 20 light air support planes to be provided to the Afghan military for training and counterinsurgency.

Embraer and its U.S.-based partner, Sierra Nevada, were awarded a $427.5 million deal, the Pentagon announced after the close of business on Wednesday.

The pair had won an initial $355 million contract in December 2011, but it was scrapped after a legal challenge from the losing bidder, then known as Hawker Beechcraft.

Brazilian leaders had voiced displeasure with the sudden cancellation, saying it would not be conducive to strengthening security ties with the United States.

Brazil's air force plans to buy 36 new fighter jets, and Chicago-based Boeing Co 's F/A-18 Super Hornet is one of three finalists along with the Saab JAS-39 Gripen of Sweden and the Dassault Rafale of France.

Wichita, Kansas-based Beechcraft, which emerged from a Chapter 11 restructuring this month, said it was disappointed to have lost the competition.

"We will meet with the (U.S. Air Force) for a full debrief of the award and determine our next steps forward at that time," Nicole Alexander, a company spokeswoman, said in an emailed statement.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
ospreycbk wrote:
So why is the US buying these aircraft and not the Afghan government, who is training the pilots and mechanics who’s paying, spare parts/logistic supports who’s paying.

Feb 27, 2013 11:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.