TEXT-Fitch rates Alaska's GO BANs 'F1+', affirms GOs at 'AAA'

Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:08pm EST

Related Topics

Feb 28 - Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'F1+' rating to $149.645 general
obligation (GO) bond anticipation notes (BANs), series 2013C (non-callable) of
the state of Alaska (the state).

The BANs are expected to sell via negotiation the week of March 14, 2013 and
will mature on March 25, 2014.

In addition, Fitch affirms the 'AAA' rating on approximately $587 million of
outstanding state of Alaska GO bonds. The rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY
General obligations to which the full faith, credit and resources of the state
are pledged.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STRONG LIKELIHOOD OF MARKET ACCESS: The 'F1+' rating on the notes reflects the
strong likelihood of market access to redeem the notes by the issuance of up to
$453.5 million of long-term bonds already authorized by qualified voters for
state transportation projects.

VERY LARGE RESERVES: Alaska has set aside very large reserves for general fund
operating needs, principally in the Constitutional Budget Reserve Fund (CBR) and
Statutory Budget Reserve Fund (SBR). The state has used recent windfalls from
high oil prices to repay past CBR draws and remains committed to maintaining
sizable reserves, a key rating factor given forecasted declines in oil
production over time. The state's reserves provide multiple times coverage of
its debt obligations.

CONSERVATIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: Conservative financial management is critical
given the state's dependency on energy-related revenues and the volatility of
energy prices and production. Fitch expects Alaska to prudently manage its
reserve funds and promptly adjust its expenditures as needed, consistent with
the state's historical practice.

ECONOMY AND FINANCES DEPENDENT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: While both natural
resources and the federal government have provided sources of employment and
income to Alaska's small population, the volatility inherent in the natural
resource industry is the state's area of vulnerability. Petroleum-related
revenue accounts for approximately 92% of unrestricted General Fund revenue.

MANAGEABLE LIABILITY POSITION: Alaska's debt burden is moderate. The state has
prudently used available cash to fund its capital needs and cash-defeased
outstanding obligations when cost-effective. Although the funded ratios of
Alaska's major statewide pension systems are weak, the state has undertaken
significant pension reforms and closed its defined benefit plans to new
employees in 2006. In addition, about half of the state's other post-employment
benefit (OPEB) obligations are pre-funded.

RATING SENSITIVITIES:
Changes in the state's 'AAA' GO bond rating to which this rating is linked.

CREDIT PROFILE
The notes being offered represent the initial offering under authorization
obtained from qualified voters on Nov. 6, 2012 (the State Transportation Bond
Act, or the Bond Act) for the design and construction of state transportation
projects. The total authorization of $453.5 million will provide funding for
various port, rail, highway, and road projects in the state. Note proceeds will
provide initial funding for the projects. The resolution authorizing these notes
includes authorization for their redemption by GO bonds issued pursuant to the
Bond Act.

The state's 'AAA' GO rating reflects the state's maintenance of very substantial
and growing reserve balances and the continuation of conservative financial
management practices at a time of strong revenue performance. State revenues are
linked closely to oil production from the North Slope and global petroleum price
trends, exposing the state to significant revenue volatility. Mitigating this
risk, state fiscal practices are generally conservative, with the state
dedicating a substantial share of oil-related revenue to reserves and employing
long-range forecasting of revenues and expenses. Reserve balances have grown
exponentially over the past several fiscal years, and Fitch believes the state
is committed to keeping reserve levels high.

Development of a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope, completion of which
would help diversify state revenues, continues, with a settlement agreement
reached with several large gas developers in March 2012. Debt practices are
conservative, with limited issuance and average amortization. The economy
remains stable. Although the state has potential exposure to federal employment
cutbacks tied to budget pressures at the federal level, its revenue system
limits its budget exposure.

RESOURCE-DEPENDENT REVENUE SYSTEM
Alaska's economic and financial performance is tied closely to its natural
resource base, with 92% of unrestricted general fund revenues derived from
petroleum-related activity estimated for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Fluctuating
global energy prices in 2007, 2008, and 2009, led to sharp surges and drops in
the state's unrestricted general fund revenues in the related fiscal years.
Revenues have grown sizably since FY 2009 along with petroleum prices, enabling
sizable growth in the state's various reserve funds. The CBR and SBR together
have grown from $8.1 billion in FY 2009 to $15.9 billion in FY 2012 and the fund
balance of the state's permanent fund has increased from $29.9 billion to $40.3
billion over this same time frame.

FY 2012 North Slope West Coast oil prices averaged $112.65 per barrel; well over
the $94.70 per barrel forecast on which the budget was based. On a GAAP basis,
FY 2012 ended on June 30 with a $3.8 billion general fund surplus, bringing the
general fund balance to $21.6 billion; more than 2x total general fund
expenditures. In addition, there was a $192.8 million net positive fund balance
change in the state's permanent fund, increasing the fund to $40.3 billion. The
fall 2012 forecast projects FY 2013 oil prices at $108.67 per barrel; down from
the $110.44 per barrel on which the budget was based. The revised estimate for
oil production is also slightly lagging forecast in FY 2013; 0.553 bbl/day now
anticipated, down from 0.563 bbl/day forecast.

The fall 2012 revenue forecast points to unrestricted general fund revenue in FY
2013 landing behind budget due to these lagging results. FY 2013 unrestricted
general fund revenues are forecast at $7.57 billion, as compared to $7.7 billion
in anticipated expenditures. The state maintains several options to close this
modest forecast gap in addition to reducing discretionary expenditures, such as
capital projects and statewide supplemental expenses.

The governor recently proposed a fiscal 2014 operating budget that forecasts oil
prices increasing slightly to $109.61 per barrel, with a slight decline in oil
production assumed. FY 2014 unrestricted general fund revenues are forecast at
$7 billion, a 6.8% decline from anticipated revenues in FY 2013. The proposed
$6.5 billion in recurring and discretionary appropriations is 14.3% less than
the prior year, primarily due to a $1.1 billion proposed cut in capital
expenditures. The proposal includes a $508 million transfer to the SBR. The
budget proposal will be considered in the 2013 legislative session. Fitch also
expects the governor to pursue reforms to the oil tax structure, with the goal
of encouraging additional investment and drilling to increase future oil
production, and will review the details as they emerge.

VERY LARGE RESERVE FUNDS
As noted above, the state has prudently set aside much of its revenue windfall
in the CBR and SBR. Deposits of surplus funds as well as dedicated petroleum
dispute settlement funds have brought the CBR's balance to over $11 billion. The
SBR has grown to $5.5 billion and over $1 billion has been set aside for
prefunding school formula payments. Additional balances available to the state
include realized earnings of the $40.3 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, measuring
almost $3 billion. These reserves may be accessed by the state by a majority
vote of the legislature; with access to the CBR restricted to a three-fourths
majority vote of the legislature should the general fund not be in a deficit
situation. The pre-funded balance for education, equal to about one year of
education expense, does not require a vote of the legislature for its use.

The state's fall 2012 forecast of increasing future oil prices combined with
declines in production is expected to result in fairly steady but modest
unrestricted general fund revenue losses through the FY 2022 forecast period.
Should the state take no action to reduce its recurring and discretionary
general fund expenditures and baseline spending growth continue, the state
forecasts General Fund operating deficits would begin in FY 2015 and grow
through the forecast period (FY 2022), resulting in the use of the SBR through
the period of the forecast to balance operations until the reserve is depleted
in FY 2020.

In the forecast, the CBR continues to grow through the forecast period until
2021, peaking at $16 billion. The permanent fund earnings reserve (PFER) is also
expected to grow through the forecast period, reaching $7 billion in FY 2022. On
a combined basis, these three reserve funds have a forecast peak of $23 billion
in FY 2019, declining to $21 billion in FY 2022. General fund expenses in FY
2022 are forecast at $8.6 billion, compared to $7.7 billion in the current
fiscal year and $6.5 billion proposed for FY 2014. Fitch expects the state to
prudently manage the application of these reserves, if such action is warranted,
and realign its discretionary expenditures as necessary.

MANAGEABLE LIABILITY POSITION
The state is an infrequent debt issuer, meeting most capital needs from current
revenues. The debt burden as of June 30, 2012 is manageable, with $894 million
in net tax-supported debt measuring 2.7% of personal income after excluding
guaranteed debt of the Housing Finance Corporation, which has never required
state support, and reimbursable school debt. The debt burden will increase to
3.2% when including the current issue. Expected borrowing for state
transportation projects will also increase the debt to per capita income ratio,
although Fitch notes that as the majority of state debt is repaid from
petroleum-related revenue the debt-to-income ratio is not as meaningful for
Alaska as for other states.

The pensions for two major statewide systems, for general public employees and
for teachers, were funded at 63% and 54.1%, respectively, as of June 30, 2011
based on the systems' 8% investment return assumption. Using Fitch's more
conservative 7% assumption, the funded ratios decline to 56.2% and 48.9%,
respectively. OPEBs alone are funded at 50.4% for general public employees and
48.1% for teachers, as of June 30, 2011. The state has undertaken multiple
pension reforms in recent years, including switching to a defined contribution
plans for new employees beginning July 1, 2006 and legislation enacted in 2007
obligating the state to assume local governments' contributions over a fixed
percentage of payroll. Additional pension reform discussions are ongoing and
Alaska has no stated plan to issue up to $5 billion in pension obligation bonds
that were authorized in 2008.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the Tax-Supported Rating
Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from IHS Global
Insight.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14, 2012;
--'Rating Municipal Short-Term Debt', dated Nov. 27, 2012;
--'U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14, 2012.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research
U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
Rating U.S. Municipal Short-Term Debt
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.