Big cuts spur calls to Congress from irate constituents

WASHINGTON Sat Mar 2, 2013 2:28pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama answers questions from the media after a meeting with Congressional leaders in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington March 1, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama answers questions from the media after a meeting with Congressional leaders in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington March 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Congress is getting an earful about the big spending cuts beginning to hit government services from worried and irate constituents, including one senator's own spouse.

Democratic Senator Thomas Carper of Delaware said his wife, "my most important constituent," asked him, "Why can't you guys get your act together? Do you know what people think of you guys?"

"I told her that Washington needs to work more like Delaware," said Carper, a former governor of the state. "In Delaware, Democrats and Republicans work together."

They have not worked together in Washington. And so the across-the-board cuts of the so-called "sequester" - which both Republicans and Democrats have said they oppose - took effect Friday night after President Barack Obama and Republican leaders failed to agree on a way to replace them with targeted spending reductions.

Up until the final few days before Friday, when the reductions began because of a law enacted in 2011, constituents urged, some begged, lawmakers to avert them.

The cuts threaten the U.S. economic recovery, could disrupt federal services from airports to national parks, and may force furloughs of hundreds of thousands of federal workers and employees of federal contractors, the administration says.

"They want to kill us all," Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, said of his constituents.

Laura Zayner, a senior officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security at Chicago's O'Hare Airport, was among 400 federal workers facing possible furloughs who came to Washington last week to lobby Congress.

"We consider the furlough a slap in the face. We take it personally," Zayner said. "We are not picking sides, Democrats or Republicans. But we want them to do their jobs and stop the cuts."

John Kelshaw, who works with the Internal Revenue Service, came to town from New Jersey. He and a few other federal workers met with Republican Representative John Runyan.

"We told him that a lot of our people live paycheck to paycheck. We said, 'Give us a break,'" Kelshaw said. He said Runyan, of New Jersey, listened but made no commitments.

WHO'S TO BLAME?

Polls so far show most Americans blame Republicans rather than Obama and his Democrats for the standoff. But that could change.

Republicans insist that any deficit-reduction replacement deal include only spending cuts. Democrats want a mix of spending cuts and tax increases.

According to a February 28 Gallup survey, 56 percent of those polled thought the cuts will damage the economy. The feeling crossed party lines, Gallup reported, with 64 percent of Republicans and 51 percent of Democrats agreeing they would inflict economic pain.

Democratic Senator Mark Pryor said his constituents in Arkansas routinely ask him, "'Why can't you guys work it out?'"

Pryor said he tells them, "Nobody has clean hands on this."

Both sides seem to size up any issue on a basis of who gets the political advantage, he said. "If someone suddenly came up with a cure to cancer, the question in Washington would be, 'Is this good or bad for Obama?'"

The president on Friday said of the cuts, "This is not a win for anybody. This is a loss for the American people."

Hatch, of Utah, said he recently told his state legislature that he expected the federal government to impose the sweeping cuts. "A number of them stood up and said maybe that's the only way we are going get any real reduction in spending," he said.

On the other side, Representative Luis Gutierrez, a Chicago Democrat who won an 11th term last year with more than 80 percent of the vote, said his constituents "tell me 'Keep on fighting, Luis, keep on fighting.'"

Representative Scott Rigell, a Virginia Republican whose district includes the shipbuilding yards in Newport News that are likely to be hit hard by cuts in military spending, was dismayed by the untargeted reductions.

Rigell got a letter from a constituent last month that read in part, "My husband, a project manager for the defense industry, went to work this morning to lay off half of his workforce because of sequestration."

In an interview, Rigell said, "When I think they (shipyard workers) could lose their jobs because of the dysfunction in Washington ... this is not acceptable to me."

"I've been at that shipyard. Some of hardest working folks I know. They're coming in at 5:30 a.m. with a lunch bucket and making $35,000 a year and wondering if they'll have a job."

(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Fred Barbash and Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (41)
TheNewWorld wrote:
“Rigell got a letter from a constituent last month that read in part, “My husband, a project manager for the defense industry, went to work this morning to lay off half of his workforce because of sequestration.”"

Really a month before the cuts was to start to take place (remember they will be made from March through September), he went to lay off half of his workforce. Sounds like someone was looking for an excuse to lay off half their work force so they blamed something that had not happened yet.

Mar 02, 2013 3:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
flashrooster wrote:
It doesn’t matter how angry constituents get. The dynamic doesn’t change. If the US was a functioning democracy we’d get a combination of revenue increases and spending cuts, because that’s what the majority wants. But because Republicans fear the radical extremist minority known as the tea party, Republicans would rather see anything happen other than to agree with the majority of Americans and increase revenues, in this case from closing tax loopholes for well-financed corporations and the rich.

Republicans have been doing this ├╝ber-partisanship nonsense for a long time now. The Democrats are now becoming the same way because they’re left with no other choice. They can either cease to be relevant and constantly give way to the Republicans, or they can start holding their ground, which is what they’ve done.

But the ball’s in the Republican court. They need to learn that you can’t have democracy without compromise. Keep in mind that Democrats aren’t saying “no” to any spending cuts and that we should only have tax increases. Their position is the compromise position, spending cuts AND revenue increases. It’s the Republicans who are acting like intransigent, spoiled brats.

Mar 02, 2013 3:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JL4 wrote:
“Up until the final few days before Friday, when the reductions began because of a law enacted in 2011, constituents urged, some begged, lawmakers to avert them.”

I don’t get it. What was wrong with the cuts negotiated in 2011?

They’ve had two years and still we’re told we’re standing on the “edge of financial disaster!” and “life as we know it will change if these cuts go through!” and “the economy will collapse if these cuts go through!”.

Either they want cuts or they don’t. I say they don’t. I say it’s all a big game of chicken – political posturing, party politics.

I say every single member of Congress can drop dead and I’ll think it’s a happy day for every American citizen.

We’ve lost patience.

Mar 02, 2013 3:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.