Candidates for mayor of Los Angeles take aim at business taxes

LOS ANGELES Sat Mar 2, 2013 6:07am EST

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa smiles at the start of the second session of the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, September 5, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa smiles at the start of the second session of the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, September 5, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Leading candidates for mayor of Los Angeles are trumpeting the need to reduce business taxes to grow the city's economy, even as the nation's second-largest metropolis scrounges for new revenue to plug a budget hole set to top $1 billion over the next four years.

A non-partisan primary will be held on Tuesday, and if no candidate secures a majority, the top two will advance to a May runoff to decide who will replace Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. One of the nation's most high-profile Latino politicians, Villaraigosa has held the office for eight years and cannot run for re-election due to term limits.

A recent independent poll shows that two Democratic elected officials from inside City Hall, Wendy Greuel and Eric Garcetti, and conservative talk-show host Kevin James are the top three contenders for the post.

Greuel and Garcetti have at times borrowed a theme promoted by Republican candidates at the national level by calling for a reduction in business taxes to promote economic growth and increase city revenues. James, the only Republican among the top candidates, has taken a similar position.

This follows years of complaints by business groups that Los Angeles imposes too many burdens on commerce. The top contenders are also opposing a half-cent sales tax increase that is on the March 5 ballot and is backed by Villaraigosa.

"Somewhere along the line, the ghost of Ronald Reagan took over the campaign for mayor of Los Angeles," said Dan Schnur, who has been one of California's top Republican political and media strategists.

Elections in Los Angeles are non-partisan, which reduces the role of party politics. The city has 3.8 million residents.

All three top contenders have said they want to overhaul the city's gross receipts tax on businesses. The tax varies by type of commerce, with Internet-based companies charged $1 per $1,000 in revenue, and professional service firms docked $5 per $1,000.

James, a former federal prosecutor and local AM radio host, said the tax should be eliminated because it takes money "right off the top."

"There's two groups that get away with that: The city of Los Angeles and the mafia, so we ought to be able to reform that," he said.

GROWTH STRATEGY

Greuel, a former City Council member, describes herself as the architect of a 15 percent cut in the gross receipts tax between 2006 and 2011. That was passed despite concerns among some officials that it would take away too much revenue.

"There were stories of doom and gloom, and in fact what we saw was more businesses come into the city of Los Angeles," said Greuel, who in her current role as Los Angeles city controller is tasked with looking for money lost to waste and fraud.

Garcetti, who supported the 15 percent cut, is the son of former Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti and in 2001 he was elected to the City Council, where he still serves. The candidate said Los Angeles needs to grow its local economy to turn around the city's finances.

"If we try to tax and cut our way out of this, I don't think that long term we'll be a fiscally healthy city," he said. "We have to get rid of a gross receipts tax that chases businesses away; we have to become more business friendly."

The campaign trail proposal to reshape the tax code comes at a time of heightened concern about the city's finances, which James has seized on to argue Los Angeles might go bankrupt.

A report last year from the city's budget office estimated that between mid-2013 and 2017, Los Angeles will accumulate debts of $1.1 billion if it does not gain new revenue or make cutbacks.

The city's budget office last year also produced a report from consulting firm Blue Sky that said eliminating the gross receipts tax would rob the city of nearly $400 million in annual revenue, despite a boost to private sector activity that would accompany a cut.

Amid criticism that the city cannot afford to lose revenue from businesses, Greuel and Garcetti have said they want to reduce the gross receipts tax gradually over time, to insulate city coffers from harm.

They are the two top candidates in the latest poll from SurveyUSA, which was conducted between February 14 and February 17 on behalf of local television station KABC. Garcetti led with 26 percent support from registered voters, followed by 23 percent for Greuel, with James at 14 percent.

City Councilwoman Jan Perry, another candidate in the race, trailed at 12 percent support in the survey, which relied on the views of 820 respondents and had a margin of error of 4.4 percent.

(Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
jaguar6cy wrote:
This is absurd. Every liberal and “progressive” knows that taxes need to be increased, never reduced. Government borrowing and spending are all they want and all they will ever demand. They learned this at union controlled government schools and liberal controlled universities, and they never dared question the sources of that truth. Come on, show the world how your economic fantasy really works.

Mar 02, 2013 9:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
jorge62 wrote:
When I started working 25 years ago the company I worked for had offices in California. The people at the company did not like doing business in California because of the non friendly business environment and the heavy taxes. Things have not changed in California and they are probably worst.

Mar 02, 2013 10:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
morbas wrote:
Business passes all expenses to the cost of the product, taxing the people, end business taxation. Simply put, the federal and state tax system needs to tax the money, not the people. State and municipality have the least progressive tax, thus are the most prone to deficits as the lower quintile wages are diminished. Revenue burden falls on the true employment engines the entrepreneurial small business, And thus the consumer. The cycle ends in municipality bankruptcy first; Municipalities Bankrupt: San Bernardino CA, Mammouth LakesCA ,Stockton CA, Central Falls MA, Hauppauge NY,Jefferson County MI, Harrisburg PA, and Boise County ID. CA avoided State Bankruptcy by taxing the money last November. The math is trivial, a National Surtax of 90% margined at $200k yields all State and Municipality expendatures revenue. This rate is less than the 1960 91.5% at $400k top federal rate as this rate applies to money below the margin as well (effective rate is 31.5% at$200k, 66.6% at $500k), ending any and all other state and municpality taxes.
The rich must pay their fair share,
Deficit is an imbalance between revenue and expendature(s). Expendature(s) are defined by a Nation’s needs; germain to any elitest view that is the welfare and happiness of it’s people.
-
An ‘under God’ metaphysical,
Greed is the aggregate of unnecessary wealth, ever expanding by fear of having less. Realizing how much less subsistence in reality is, represents a gentile epiphany. Conceptuality is a metaphysical independent of physical wealth.

morbas(i)

Mar 02, 2013 11:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.