White House: unlocking of cellphones should be legal

Mon Mar 4, 2013 7:22pm EST

People take photos in Times Square in New York, September 29, 2012. REUTERS/Andrew Burton

People take photos in Times Square in New York, September 29, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Cellphone users should be allowed to switch their devices to any mobile carrier, the White House said on Monday in response to an online petition against the recent banning of the practice.

More than 100,000 people signed the petition protesting the ban on switching imposed by the Library of Congress, which took effect in January. At issue is whether cellphone buyers, who get new devices at a heavily subsidized price in return for committing to long-term contracts, should be able to take their gadgets with them when they change carriers.

Many in the telecoms industry argue that cellphones should be "locked" - or prevented from moving freely across networks - because of the massive subsidies that carriers provide, effectively putting the devices in the hands of more people.

The petition argued that preventing "unlocking" reduces consumer choice and resale value of phones, which can cost hundreds of dollars without subsidies from carriers like AT&T Inc, Verizon Wireless and Sprint.

"The White House agrees with the 114,000+ of you who believe that consumers should be able to unlock their cell phones without risking criminal or other penalties," R. David Edelman, a senior advisor for Internet, Innovation, & Privacy to the Obama administration, wrote in the White House's response.

"This is particularly important for secondhand or other mobile devices that you might buy or receive as a gift, and want to activate on the wireless network that meets your needs - even if it isn't the one on which the device was first activated. All consumers deserve that flexibility."

The Library of Congress, which among other things is responsible for setting rules and deciding on exemptions related to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, said on Monday the issue would benefit from further debate and that its intention was not to supplant public policy discussion.

The Library of Congress got involved late last year during a rulemaking session conducted by the Register of Copyrights, which advises the organization. Unidentified participants in the rulemaking process, a technical, legal proceeding that allows members of the public to request exemptions to the copyright act, raised the issue then.

The Library of Congress subsequently decided that cellphones should no longer be exempted from the relevant section of copyright law, triggering the January ban on "unlocking."

(Reporting by Edwin Chan in San Francisco; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
nhirsch wrote:
It’s my phone. I should be able to do with it what I want. Regarding any contract I have with the carrier, of course that would have to be honored including if I cancel, I’d be obligated to pay the cancellation penalty. But remember I own the phone, not the carrier. I love this White House. It has such smarts I haven’t seen in previous administrations.

Mar 04, 2013 8:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
piece_of_mind wrote:
I agree, as long as you honor all contract obligations, it really is your phone, not the carriers. Can you say 4 more years, we as a people need to exercise our right to vote, and if the administration makes bad decisions like these, vote them out….

Mar 04, 2013 10:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Yep, this administration is such a well oiled machine, things couldn’t be any better. We are all living the high life now.

Mar 04, 2013 11:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.