Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Washington state lawmaker backpedals after saying cyclists pollute by breathing

Related Topics

SEATTLE | Mon Mar 4, 2013 10:40pm EST

SEATTLE (Reuters) - A Washington state lawmaker has apologized for telling a bike store owner, in a spat over a proposed bike fee, that bicyclists can cause pollution - just by breathing out carbon dioxide.

Ed Orcutt, a ranking Republican member of the state House of Representatives Transportation committee, said in an email exchange with a bike shop owner that drivers and bicyclists should both share the burden of preserving the roads they use.

"You claim that it is environmentally friendly to ride a bike," Orcutt wrote to Dale Carlson, the owner of three bicycle shops in the Tacoma and Olympia areas who voiced concern that a proposed $25 fee on bicycle sales of $500 or more could hurt his business.

"But if I am not mistaken, a cyclists has an increased heart rate and respiration ... Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant, bicyclist are actually polluting when they ride," Orcutt wrote late last month.

On Monday, Orcutt hit the brakes and made a U-turn.

"My point was that by not driving a car, a cyclist was not necessarily having a zero-carbon footprint," Orcutt wrote in an email delivered to constituents. "In looking back, it was not a point worthy of even mentioning so, again, I apologize."

Orcutt, who has been a member of the Washington state House since 2002, said he supports the fee for bicycles to help pay for street infrastructure, but little else from a revenue package proposed by House Democrats two weeks ago that would raise roughly $9.8 billion over 10 years by raising taxes, among other proposals.

"The idea of bicyclists paying for some of the infrastructure they are using is one which merits consideration," Orcutt wrote.

Carlson, the owner of the stores, wrote an email to lawmakers on the House Transportation Committee, saying cyclists should not be discouraged from an activity that is healthier for humans and the planet.

"I thought it was so off the wall - that (Orcutt) was being sarcastic or something," Carlson told Reuters.

Orcutt is correct that a human likely produces more carbon dioxide while riding a bicycle than sitting in a car, but that is part of the natural cycle of human metabolism, said Thomas Ackerman, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington.

"It's a question of where that CO2 comes from," Ackerman said. "CO2 is only a pollutant when it comes from fossil fuels."

(Reporting by Eric M. Johnson; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
BlancaP wrote:
Proving yet again that almost any moron can get elected to public office.

Mar 05, 2013 1:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Revelater wrote:
Now BlancaP proves as well that almost any Moron cant get duped into believing the so called experts statements. I quote “CO2 is only a pollutant when it comes from fossil fuels.” The “expert” making that statement was almost as moronic as the moron politicians statement was. Co2 is Co2 whether it comes from a truck, lungs or volcano. The latter of which put out a combined world total of Co2 in a day that all the cars in america put out in a year.

Mar 06, 2013 6:58am EST  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
The truth is that governmental spending to pave, or at least maintain and mark bike lanes plus the special signage required, represents a very substantial expense. If you spread that cost over the relatively few cyclists (as compared to motorists, who pay for road maintenance in the gasoline tax), a single bicycle license, which should required everywhere, would probably cost SEVERAL THOUSAND DOLLARS.

Oh, and by the way, the trillions of tons of plankton in the oceans and seas of the world put out more CO2 than cars and Volcanoes combined.

Mar 06, 2013 10:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.