U.S. envoy walks out of nuclear meeting over Iran's Israel remark

VIENNA Wed Mar 6, 2013 2:55pm EST

New U.S. ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Joseph Macmanus adjusts his glasses as he attends a board of governors meeting at the UN headquarters in Vienna March 4, 2013. REUTERS/Herwig Prammer

New U.S. ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Joseph Macmanus adjusts his glasses as he attends a board of governors meeting at the UN headquarters in Vienna March 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Herwig Prammer

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations nuclear watchdog walked out of an agency meeting on Wednesday in protest when Iran's representative accused Washington's ally Israel of "genocide", diplomats said.

Officials from Canada and Australia also left the closed-door meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) 35-nation governing board when Iran's Ali Asghar Soltanieh made his statement during a debate on Syria, they said.

They later returned to the closed-door IAEA meeting, where such action is unusual though it has happened before in other international forums.

Soltanieh was not immediately available for comment. Iran has often criticized Israeli policies towards the Palestinians. It has also said Israel would be wiped "off the face of the earth" if the Jewish state attacked it.

U.S. envoy Joseph Macmanus's walkout highlighted tensions with Tehran a few hours after he accused the Islamic Republic of a "commitment to deception, defiance, and delay" in addressing IAEA concerns about possible nuclear weapons-related research.

The European Union also used the meeting to call on Iran to stop obstructing an IAEA investigation and give the agency access to sites and documents, regardless of broader talks between Iran and world powers that resumed last week.

Some diplomats say Iran is using its meetings with the IAEA merely for leverage in negotiations with world powers which, unlike the U.N. agency, have the power to ease sanctions that they have recently tightened on the major oil producer.

"Iran is inviting further isolation, pressure and censure from the international community ... until it meets its obligations and addresses the board's concerns," Macmanus said.

During the debate on Iran, which happened before the board turned its attention to Syria, Soltanieh said the allegations over his country's nuclear work were "baseless" and suggested the IAEA, not Tehran, was to blame for the failure so far to revive the stalled inquiry.

Saying U.N. inspectors had found no evidence of any diversion of nuclear material or activities to military purposes, Soltanieh told the board: "Nuclear weapons have no place in the defense doctrine of Iran."

Macmanus accused Iran of "provocative actions", particularly the installation of advanced centrifuges that would enable it to speed up its uranium enrichment.

INSPECTOR ACCESS

Western countries fear Iran is enriching uranium to develop the capacity to build nuclear weapons and have imposed several rounds of sanctions. Iran says the program is legitimate and intended for purely peaceful purposes.

Israel - widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal - says Tehran is secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons and has threatened pre-emptive strikes if it deems diplomacy ultimately futile.

Yukiya Amano, the 65-year-old Japanese diplomat appointed to a second four-year term as head of the IAEA on Wednesday said he his aim was to help resolve the Iran nuclear issue through diplomatic means.

"For that I need cooperation from Iran," he told reporters.

The Vienna-based IAEA has been trying for more than a year to persuade Iran to give it the access it says it needs for its investigation, so far without progress.

Iran has refused IAEA requests to visit the Parchin military site, where inspectors suspect explosives tests relevant for nuclear weapons development took place, possibly a decade ago.

Iran says it first needs to agree with the IAEA on how the inquiry is to be conducted before allowing any Parchin visit.

Last week, six world powers resumed talks with Iran aimed at finding a diplomatic settlement to a decade-old dispute that threatens to trigger a new Middle East war. The only progress was an agreement to hold more talks.

The United States, China, France, Russia, Britain and Germany offered modest relief from economic sanctions in return for Iran scaling back its most sensitive nuclear activity.

Iran called the talks a potential "turning point" but Western officials were more cautious, merely describing the meeting as "useful".

(Additional reporting by Derek Brooks; Editing by Robin Pomeroy and Michael Roddy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
reality-again wrote:
The regime in Tehran exports crude oil, but it needs to import fuel, and the next step should be to prevent them from doing so.

Mar 06, 2013 7:34am EST  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
“Iran says it first needs to agree with the IAEA on how the inquiry is to be conducted before allowing any Parchin visit.

Iran is right. This is a fishing expedition.

IAEA has no mandate to inspect military bases. Iran can not accept that IAEA act as a Western spying agency.

Iran has already granted the IAEA two visits at Perchin.

The West likes to talk about Iran’s stalling tactics. But these repeated requests to inspect Perchin are real stalling tactics aimed at prolonging the manufactured nuclear issue.

Iran has the right to know WHY, HOW and HOW LONG IAEA will carry inspection at Perchin which is not subject to IAEA inspection regime in the first place.

If Iran allows the IAEA or anybody into its military bases it must be under strict conditions.

If Israel was subjected to these kinds of demands, it would reject them outright and the West would remain silent or some of its leaders would repeat the broken record: Israel has the right to defend itself.

Mar 06, 2013 9:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
TruthMonitor wrote:
@reality again: Get a fact check, Iran refines its own fuel.

Mar 06, 2013 9:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.