Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Bill Clinton says anti-gay marriage law he signed should be overturned

Related Topics

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton speaks during a news conference at the international university in Casablanca February 24, 2013 REUTERS/Stringer

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton speaks during a news conference at the international university in Casablanca February 24, 2013

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

WASHINGTON | Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:26pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former President Bill Clinton, who in 1996 signed into law an act defining marriage as between a man and woman, said on Thursday the measure was unconstitutional and should be overturned by the Supreme Court.

In an opinion piece in the Washington Post, Clinton, a Democrat who served as president from 1993 to 2001, said it was "a very different time" when he signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law. No U.S. state then recognized gay marriage, although some were moving in that direction, he said.

With federal lawmakers then debating various responses, "some quite draconian," many supporters of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, believed its passage would defuse moves to push for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, Clinton wrote.

Noting that the Supreme Court will hear arguments on March 27 challenging the constitutionality of DOMA, Clinton wrote the justices "must decide whether it is consistent with the principles of a nation that honors freedom, equality and justice above all, and is therefore constitutional.

"As the president who signed the act into law, I have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and in fact, incompatible with our Constitution."

The Obama administration has also urged the high court to strike down the law, saying it violates the guarantees of equal protection under the law by denying same-sex married couples federal benefits available to married heterosexuals.

Nine states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage.

Clinton wrote that when he signed the law, he included a statement that its enactment should not "be understood to provide an excuse for discrimination."

"Reading those words today, I know now that, even worse than providing an excuse for discrimination, the law is itself discriminatory. It should be overturned," he said.

(Writing by Peter Cooney; Editing by David Brunnstrom)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
ChicagoFats wrote:
We do have a third party in this country after all: the Pragmatics. Sometimes you find them on both sides of the aisle.

Mar 08, 2013 12:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
ARJTurgot2 wrote:
Yeah, but in Clinton’s case pragmatism always looks more like sleazy opportunism.

Mar 08, 2013 8:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
PosterBoiz wrote:
It takes a big man to admit to his mistakes. Gay marriage only affects gay folks, so straight folks should not be involved, since it does not affect them. Not only does the constitution demand equality for all, it also states, “The majority shall not rule the minority, lest a government of tyranny exist”. Therefore, even if the majority doesn’t like same-sex marriage, too bad; don’t marry the same sex. Problem solved.

Mar 12, 2013 1:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.