Housing Department plans 7-day shut down due to sequester cuts

WASHINGTON Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:02pm EDT

A new condominium building is shown under construction in the Brickell Ave. area in Miami, Florida February 14, 2013. REUTERS/JOE SKIPPER

A new condominium building is shown under construction in the Brickell Ave. area in Miami, Florida February 14, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/JOE SKIPPER

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on Monday said it plans to shut its doors for a total of seven days between May and September due to budget cuts and will furlough more than 9,000 employees on those days.

Across-the-board cuts known as sequestration are forcing government agencies to reduce spending. The government furloughs are a result of those $85 billion cuts that began on March 1 after a gridlocked U.S. Congress was unable to resolve fiscal fights and find a solution to replace the sequestration.

The seven furlough days will be spread out, according to HUD, and will impact HUD's work force at its main headquarters and all 80 field offices.

All employees will be impacted, and only staffers considered as critical would be required to work during designated closure days. The critical staffers will be scheduled for furlough on seven other days.

"Everybody will have the same number of furlough days," said HUD spokesman Jerry Brown. "We're trying to not have more than one furlough day per period," referring to the federal government's standard two-week pay period.

The agency will determine the exact shutdown dates at a later time.

In cataloging the impact of sequestration to a Senate panel last month, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan warned lawmakers that the government spending cuts would have harsh consequences for housing programs and could threaten Superstorm Sandy recovery efforts in the U.S. Northeast.

"The ripple effects are enormous because of how central housing is to our economy," Donovan told lawmakers.

HUD has held a town hall meeting to go over the furlough plans, but no formal notices have been sent at this time.

(Reporting By Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
bobber1956 wrote:
I wonder if all those folks that voted for obama have enough sense to realize what HE is doing to them?

Mar 11, 2013 3:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
morbas wrote:
The THOR hammer of state and municipality budgets is unfair revenue burdening of the lower 4/5th quintile per capita incomes. Taxation at state and municipal levels is less progressive than federal, which burdens the lowest income levels with the highest effective rate; and the upper 2 percent with the lowest effective rate. Thus, municipalities borrow more in a recession, as the lower quintile’ wages are more diminished. Revenue burden falls on the true employment engines the entrepreneurial small business, And thus the consumer.

The House of Representatives has the authority of taxation and can look no where else to shed it’s purpose. “…that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;…”.

Have a happy day :-)

Mar 11, 2013 4:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.