Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

India court bars Italian envoy from leaving country in marines dispute

Related Topics

Italian marines Salvatore Girone (L) and Massimiliano Latorre (C) arrive with Italian Navy Chief of Staff Admiral Luigi Pinelli Mantelli at Ciampino airport in Rome, December 22, 2012. REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi

Italian marines Salvatore Girone (L) and Massimiliano Latorre (C) arrive with Italian Navy Chief of Staff Admiral Luigi Pinelli Mantelli at Ciampino airport in Rome, December 22, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Alessandro Bianchi

NEW DELHI | Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:05am EDT

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India's top court on Thursday temporarily barred the Italian ambassador from leaving the country, the latest escalation in a dispute over the killing of two Indian fishermen by Italian marines.

India had summoned the Italian ambassador this week to protest against Rome's decision not to send two marines charged with killing the fishermen while on anti-piracy duty back to India to face trial.

Separately, an Indian politician who heads a regional party has filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Italian government over the decision.

The court ordered ambassador Daniele Mancini not to leave India, and to respond to the petition by March 18, raising questions about whether this violated the envoy's diplomatic immunity.

"The Chief Justice issued a notice to the Italian ambassador stating not to leave the country and has sought a reply from the ambassador by March 18," said Viplav Sharma, defense counsel for the Italian marines.

India's Supreme Court had allowed Massimiliano Latorre and Salvatore Girone to return home for four weeks to vote in last month's general election, provided they returned. They have not done so, and Italy's Foreign Ministry said the incident had become a formal dispute over U.N. laws.

"(The dispute) has shaken the confidence of the people whether foreign powers can take our Supreme Court so lightly. It is a very serious contempt," Subramanian Swamy, the politician who filed the petition, told reporters on Thursday.

India's Supreme Court said in a long-awaited ruling in January that India had jurisdiction to try the marines, but Italy has challenged that decision, arguing that the shooting took place in international waters.

The sailors arrived back in Italy on February 23, a day before the country's election, after India's Supreme Court granted their request to exercise their right to vote.

Italy's announcement the sailors would not return has sparked fury in India. The case has caused an uproar in parliament and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government is under pressure to respond forcefully.

Singh issued an unusually strong statement on Wednesday in which he accused Italy of violating "every rule of diplomatic discourse" and warned that if the sailors did not return "there will be consequences for our relations with Italy".

"We have to take steps, there is no question that we won't take any steps," Salman Khurshid, India's foreign minister, told reporters on Thursday.

"You can be certain that this is a matter that will be treated with the greatest urgency. It will be treated with determination to ensure that we do not suffer."

A government official said India was weighing what steps it could take, including expelling the ambassador, but that it was unlikely to take any action before March 22, when the sailors are due to appear again in court.

"I am the envoy. I will represent the government of Italy until the very moment when (a competent authority) would declare me persona non grata," Mancini told reporters on the sidelines of an event in New Delhi late on Wednesday.

(Editing by Matthias Williams, Ross Colvin, Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Mott wrote:
Pirates near Kerala coastline? What are these folks smoking? What data was presented on being in international waters when they took the two lives?

Mar 14, 2013 3:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Free_Pacific wrote:
This is Italy repaying India for allowing the men to return home, despite the affront this would have been to the dead mens families.

India needs to take a very hard line indeed, including reciprocal steps, if Italy does not rectify it’s trajectory.

Mar 14, 2013 6:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
nawabs wrote:
a) The Italian Ambassador acted as a guarantor to the Supreme Court of India, in a judicial matter. This representation was to a Court, and not to the Government of India. In doing so, he was acting on personal surety and not in diplomatic capacity. Fundamentally, he got involved in a judicial matter. Government-Government matters are covered by diplomatic standing. This was not the case here.

b) The matter at hand is not diplomatic, but judicial in nature. It is not GoI vs. Italy diplomatic dispute, but Supreme Court of India vs. Italian Ambassador. He made a personal representation to the court in a criminal case. That representation is not covered under diplomatic norms. Thus, in this Vienna Conventions do not hold. It is a legal dispute. The issue at hand is at the very least contempt of court for which he must face trial.

c) Even if GoI were to expel the Ambassador, he cannot leave the country without SC lifting his travel ban and absolving him of criminal contempt. In democracy, elected governments do not get to overrule judiciary matters arbitrarily. Even if GoI was to attempt and extend him diplomatic coverage for this and help him out — the fact that he is in contempt of court in a capacity that is not of a diplomat, would not allow it to.

Mar 14, 2013 2:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.