Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Asia's defense spending overtakes Europe's: IISS

Related Topics

Sukhoi-30 aircrafts drop bombs on the targets during the Indian Air Force (IAF) fire power demonstration exercise ''Iron Fist 2013'' in Pokhran, Rajasthan February 22, 2013. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi

Sukhoi-30 aircrafts drop bombs on the targets during the Indian Air Force (IAF) fire power demonstration exercise ''Iron Fist 2013'' in Pokhran, Rajasthan February 22, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Adnan Abidi

LONDON | Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:08am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Asia's defense spending overtook Europe's for the first time last year, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) said on Thursday, reflecting China's military rise and shrinking European economies.

In its annual report on the world's militaries, it said China's defense spending in real terms rose 8.3 percent between 2011 and 2012, while in Asia as a whole, spending rose 4.94 percent last year.

At the same time, nominal defense spending among European NATO members had shrunk to around 2006 levels due to budget cuts, the IISS said in "The Military Balance 2013".

"Indeed, the increase in Asian spending has been so rapid, and the defense austerity pursued by European states so severe, that in 2012 nominal Asian spending ($287.4 billion) exceeded total official defense spending not just in NATO Europe, but across all of Europe, including spending by non-NATO European states," it said.

The IISS, however, played down Washington's planned "pivot" to Asia, saying that it had announced only limited new military deployments there while reducing in its forces in Europe. "But as far as Asia was concerned there was less to this rebalance than first appeared," the report said.

It also noted the United States continued to dominate defense spending, accounting for 45.3 percent of the global total.

Asian countries have been steadily raising defense spending, using resilient economic growth to fund militaries able to cope with an increasingly complex regional environment.

"China is now clearly the second-largest defense spender in the world," it said, adding that if it could sustain economic growth, it could match U.S. levels between 2025 and 2028.

North Korea, which conducted a third nuclear test last month, continued to add to its military capabilities.

Among these, the report said, were a plutonium stockpile sufficient for four to 12 nuclear weapons, a uranium-enrichment program that could add enough fissile material for an extra one or two weapons a year and an array of short and medium-range ballistic missiles.

It also had the world's third-largest chemical weapons arsenal and possibly biological weapons.

The multiplicity of threats in Asia, as different countries take action to counter others, mean "there is substantial evidence of action-reaction dynamics taking hold and influencing regional states' military programs," the IISS said.

India, whose heavy reliance on imports makes it one of the largest defense markets for foreign suppliers, continued to build capabilities geared towards both Pakistan and China.

Japan and South Korea, meanwhile, were trying to build their defenses against North Korea's nuclear and missile programs.

(Editing by Andrew Roche)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Free_Pacific wrote:
If a particular mainland power, was not so determined to steal and rob it’s way to territorial expansion, all the growth we are seeing in the Asia-Pacific could have gone to where it needed to be. Hospitals, schools, welfare and institution strengthening.

Alas, just like 1930′s Europe, one nation is determined to alter the status quo and expand it’s borders, preaching ‘historical rights’. I doubt the Europeans will want to die for our rights, as they had us die for theirs in countless wars. Fortunately, enough countries are being threatened, that we here are being pulled together. Arrogance always repays the arrogant.

Mar 14, 2013 6:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MikeBarnett wrote:
@Free_Pacific

Fortunately, the US destroys US computers, cell phones, digital cameras, and fertilizer, the basic components of smart munitions. The US destroys US ground and air vehicles. The US burns billions of gallons of US gasoline, diesel fuel, and aviation fuel. The US wastes billions of US man hours in unproductive work.

In addition, the US Dot Bomb Bubble of 2000, the US Accounting Scandal of 2002-2003, and the US Financial Scandal of 2008 to the present proves that US technology, corporate, and financial criminals cheated the US, US allies, and the entire world. The Bush and Obama regimes only prosecuted a handful of the US criminals, making the Bush and Obama regimes accessories after the fact to the crimes. Therefore, the US economy remains in the hands of criminals; the Bush regime was a criminal organization; and the Obama regime is a criminal organization. The best results are that the economic, Republican, and Democratic criminal organizations fight, bribe, swindle, and cheat each other, making the US weaker by the day.

The glorious news is that the US is failing internationally and domestically and soon will be unable to contaminate the Asia/Pacific region with its evil aggressions. The arrogant Americans are being punished for their arrogance.

Mar 16, 2013 2:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.