Third concert canceled as San Francisco Symphony strike continues

SAN FRANCISCO Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:08pm EDT

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The San Francisco Symphony canceled a Saturday night concert, the third since the orchestra's musicians went on strike earlier in the week.

Both sides said they were negotiating to try to resolve differences before the 103 symphony players are scheduled to leave next week for a U.S. East Coast tour featuring recitals at Carnegie Hall in New York and the Kennedy Center in Washington.

With no deal reached, management canceled a Saturday night performance of Mahler's Ninth Symphony, said symphony spokesman Oliver Theil.

The strike, which began when the musicians failed to show up for a Wednesday rehearsal, forced the symphony to cancel two concerts earlier in the week.

Symphony management and union representatives met with a federal mediator for marathon bargaining sessions on Thursday and Friday. Neither side would comment on Saturday about the progress of talks except to say they were continuing to work toward a new three-year contract.

"Talks are ongoing," said musicians' spokesman Nathan Ballard.

Theil told Reuters negotiations went past midnight on Saturday.

The musicians say that to retain the most talented players, they must be compensated as well as their peers in the country's top orchestras. Base pay for musicians in the Chicago Symphony Orchestra and the Los Angeles Philharmonic is slightly higher than base pay for San Francisco Symphony musicians.

San Francisco Symphony musicians earn an average annual salary of $165,000, with a minimum salary of $141,700, Theil said. The union has said management was out to freeze musicians' wages.

Brent Assink, symphony executive director, said concert production, healthcare and pension costs were rising nearly four times as fast as revenues.

The symphony's musicians have been working without a contract since February 15, five days after the ensemble received its 15th Grammy Award for best orchestral performance.

(Editing by James B. Kelleher and Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
johnste3 wrote:
It looks to me like their $165,000 average salary is far above the earnings of the average musician in America, therefore their compensation is not fair and they should be punished with taxes.

A sustainable solution would be to tax their income and generate a trust for Affordable Music from which musicians who were not as well connected as these fortunate few could draw from until such time as everyone earned the same amount of money.

All musicians, not just those in SF, should be forced to join this trust – even if they are not earning money. If they choose not to join, they should have to pay a one-time fee not to play music.

Hey, it works for health care. Why not music?

Mar 16, 2013 8:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.