Washington state names "pot czar" after legalizing marijuana

SEATTLE Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:11pm EDT

Marijuana is broken up for use by customers at Frankie Sports Bar and Grill in Olympia, Washington on December 9, 2012. REUTERS/Nick Adams

Marijuana is broken up for use by customers at Frankie Sports Bar and Grill in Olympia, Washington on December 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Nick Adams

Related Topics

SEATTLE (Reuters) - The state of Washington, which legalized the recreational use of marijuana in November, has hired its first "pot czar," a $300-per-hour consulting firm that will help sort out the complexities of setting up and regulating a cannabis market.

Botec Analysis Corp, a Massachusetts-based think tank specializing in crime and drug policy, was chosen for the job over 112 other applicants, the state's Liquor Control Board said on Tuesday.

In November, Washington state and Colorado became the first U.S. states to legalize marijuana for recreational use following popular votes in both states. Nineteen other states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana.

The new law in Washington state will ultimately permit cannabis to be sold and taxed at state-licensed stores in a system to be modeled after those in many states for alcohol sales. The Liquor Control Board has until December to set up such a system.

Botec Chief Executive Mark Kleiman will supervise a 30-member team, billing the state at $300 per hour, according to the Liquor Control Board, which has allocated an initial $100,000 for the project. Kleiman teaches public policy at the University of California, Los Angeles and has written a book about marijuana legalization.

Botec's subcontractors will include the California-based RAND Corporation and Steep Hill Lab, a marijuana testing facility in Oakland, California.

"The world's eyes are upon us and failing is not an option," David Lampach, Steep Hill's co-founder, told a news conference in Olympia announcing the selection.

The terms of a contract between Botec and the Liquor Control Board were being negotiated and would be finalized after a brief period in which other bidders can challenge the selection, officials said.

"This team's lead members and subcontractors are among the world's leading experts on marijuana and drug policy," board chairwoman Sharon Foster said in a statement. "Their credentials speak for themselves."

Marijuana use remains illegal under federal law. The U.S. Justice Department has not said whether it will sue to block the state laws in Washington and Colorado.

In Washington state, it remains a crime to sell, cultivate or share the drug, drive under the influence of pot or imbibe in places where alcohol is illegal.

In California, a state lawmaker on Tuesday announced proposed legislation to bring medical marijuana under control of the state's Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb, Cynthia Johnston and David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
bobber1956 wrote:
Since I am just a common idiot and Washington State Resident I have a couple of questions I am sure will go unanswered.

1 Since this have NEVER been done before EVER, ANYWHERE, how can anyone be experienced enough to be a consultant at all much less be worth $300 an hour for something that NO ONE knows ANYTHING about?

2 I have lived in WA for 50+ years and know for a fact that there are just as many companies HERE that know just as LITTLE about this as anyone from Massachusetts so why are we not using a someone locally to charge us $300 dollars an hour for something they know nothing about. I also know there are plenty of companies here that can and in some cases do that already so why not just use one of those?

I know I could think of a few more stupid questions to ask but my brain is starting to hurt from lowering my intelligence level far enough to ask the obvious of the stupid liberal idiots that dreamed up this waste of money. And since my liberal second grade school teacher told me there was no question too stupid to ask perhaps I will get some answers-but I doubt it.

Now the smart question. Just what in the h—are you people thinking about? Oh, you are not thinking at all. Smoking up the profits already I see.

Mar 19, 2013 8:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
snis wrote:
These people are experts at dealing with the federal government. The they are setting it up so if there are going to be legal fights then Washingtion state will be prepared for it. Believe me this has been done many times before.

You should stop being pessimistic and assume people in our government all just want to waste money.

Mar 20, 2013 2:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.