Mississippi forbids local laws on nutrition, super-size drinks

JACKSON, Mississippi Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:06pm EDT

A 64-ounce drink is displayed alongside other soft drink cup sizes at a news conference at City Hall in New York, May 31, 2012. REUTERS/Andrew Burton

A 64-ounce drink is displayed alongside other soft drink cup sizes at a news conference at City Hall in New York, May 31, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton

Related Topics

JACKSON, Mississippi (Reuters) - Mississippi, the state with the highest rate of obesity, has banned its cities and counties from trying to stop restaurants from selling super-sized soft drinks or requiring them to post nutritional information about meals.

The move came a week after a judge blocked an effort by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to prohibit vending machines, movie theaters and retailers from selling single-serving sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (473 ml), an effort that was intended to tackle the public health problems caused by rising rates of obesity.

Mississippi's new law, signed by Governor Phil Bryant on Monday, also prohibits municipalities from banning toys in fast-food meals, saying that only the state can regulate nutrition.

"It is simply not the role of government to micro-regulate citizens' dietary decisions," Bryant said in a statement after signing the measure. "The responsibility for one's personal health depends on individual choices about a proper diet and appropriate exercise."

Although no local regulations had been passed in the state, the law was seen as a preemptive measure against the type of ban that Bloomberg proposed before a court ruled it had too many loopholes and would be difficult to enforce.

Supporters of Mississippi's new law said food-and-beverage regulations should be made at the state level to eliminate confusion and save food businesses from having to navigate a patchwork of local laws.

"The key words are consistency and uniformity," said Mike Cashion, executive director of the Mississippi Hospitality and Restaurant Association, which has been one of the law's strongest advocates.

Mississippi has the highest rate of obesity of any U.S. state, with 34.9 percent of its residents weighing in at 30 pounds or more above their ideal weight, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. It is unlikely the state will tackle its obesity problem through food regulations, said Sandra Shelson, executive director of the Partnership for a Healthy Mississippi.

She noted that Mississippi has no statewide regulations on smoking in public places, though several dozen local municipalities have passed such laws.

"It's never a good idea to take away the control of some of the local governments," Shelson said. "If you have a community that wants to make itself healthier, the state shouldn't be in the business of trying to preclude it from making changes that'd result in making it a healthier place."

(Editing by Scott Malone and Steve Orlofsdky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
gregbrew56 wrote:
I find it very interesting that governors object as an overreach against state rights when the Fed strikes down state regulations on immigration because it’s “a Federal function to regulate immigration”. But these very same governors are OK with telling local governments that it’s a state function to regulate nutrition, and that this is not an overreach against local control. Sounds pretty hypocritical.

Mar 19, 2013 5:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
acspore wrote:
Let America be fat and lazy, especially the Red states. For that matter, forget global warming, forget evolution, forget science, let the Red states be, it’s their right not to evovle and progress, heck, civilization, what’s that? Let ‘em remain or return to whatever century they believe were the good ol’ days.

Mar 19, 2013 8:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
CobraBKeX wrote:
I think it is funny though that the picture above still is completely inaccurate anyway. I absolutely hate it when they call them “sugary” drinks, and use blocks of sugar in this example to compare how much “sugar” is in the drinks. However, soft drinks in ‘murica do not have “sugar”. They contain “High fructose corn syrup” (HFCS). This is NOT sugar, it is a syrup that has replaced real cane sugar, and since its introduction it has lead to the high obesity rates in the US. Rather than working so hard to prevent people from getting drinks, try putting pressure on the cola companies from using HFCS rather than cane sugar. I am not saying that replacing that much soda with real sugar is better, but it is still not as bad as that nasty HFCS substance messing up your metabolism, taste sensitivity, and other negative health effects compared to cane sugar. Don’t be fooled by the corn refiner’s attempts to rename HFCS to “corn sugar”, because it is in fact NOT “sugar” at all.

Mar 20, 2013 7:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.