Gun rights backers vow court fight against new Colorado laws

DENVER Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:47pm EDT

A Palmetto M4 assault rifle is seen at the Rocky Mountain Guns and Ammo store in Parker, Colorado July 24, 2012. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

A Palmetto M4 assault rifle is seen at the Rocky Mountain Guns and Ammo store in Parker, Colorado July 24, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

DENVER (Reuters) - Only a day after Colorado's governor signed laws setting limits on ammunition and imposing background checks, gun rights advocates have vowed to sue, some county sheriffs have declined to enforce the measures, and an ammunition magazine manufacturer is leaving the state.

The measures signed into law on Wednesday by Governor John Hickenlooper will ban ammunition magazines with more than 15 rounds, require universal background checks for gun buyers and force gun buyers to pay for their own background checks.

Colorado has seen two of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history, and the legislation represented an effort to prevent those types of killings. The measures were also passed during a national debate over firearms violence reignited by the December slayings of 20 children and six adults at a school in Connecticut.

The laws' passages are considered a victory for Democrats in a state where gun ownership is treasured.

The Denver-based libertarian group Independence Institute said it would file a lawsuit either in state or federal court against Colorado seeking to block the measures that are set to go into effect on July 1.

"We're going to court and the people in 2014 are going to have an opportunity to choose a new legislature and a new governor," said David Kopel, research director for the group.

In another challenge to gun-control measures enacted after the Connecticut school shootings, a National Rifle Association affiliate filed a lawsuit on Thursday charging that New York state's laws banning assault weapons and limiting the size of ammunition magazines violated the constitutional right to bear arms.


Ammunition magazine manufacturer Magpul, which has a plant in Erie, Colorado, threatened before the passage of the Colorado bill to leave the state and take away what its executives said were 200 direct jobs and 400 jobs at related companies in its supply chain.

On its Facebook page, Magpul said it would go through with the threat to move, and supporters posted comments inviting them to their own states such as Missouri and Nevada.

"Our transition to a new home will occur in a phased and orderly manner to allow us to continue to serve our customers during the move, as well as to allow an orderly transition for affected employees," the company's statement on Facebook said.

A representative for Magpul did not return calls.

Eric Brown, spokesman for the governor, said in an email that nothing in the bills signed by Hickenlooper would prevent Magpul from "manufacturing here and selling elsewhere."

Meanwhile, a number of county sheriffs in Colorado have said they cannot or will not enforce the new gun control laws, even as the governor's office has directed state officials to give law enforcement agencies technical guidance on how the magazine limits in particular should be interpreted and enforced.

"We expect sheriffs to follow all state laws to the best of their abilities," Brown said.

In July 2012, a gunman opened fire in a crowded theater at the opening night of the Batman movie "The Dark Knight Rises" in the Denver suburb of Aurora, killing 12 people and wounding 58 others.

Colorado was also the site of a 1999 massacre at Columbine High School, where two teenagers shot dead a teacher and 12 other students before committing suicide.

(This story corrects to show Magpul is an ammunition magazine manufacturer, not an ammunition manufacturer)

(Additional reporting by Joseph Ax in New York; Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
poisonvamp wrote:
It is becoming increasingly frustrating the way the media is reporting on the new Colorado measures. They obviously have not read the legislation.

This article states the measures “will ban ammunition magazines with more than 15 rounds, require universal background checks for gun buyers”. That is only partial true. HB1229 requires background checks for almost all transfers. It does not specify transfer of ownership. Any lending of a firearm while not in the owners presence for more than 72 hours consists of a transfer under the legislation. And due to “constructive possession” if you live with anyone that is not an immediate family member and are out of town for more than 72 hours this would also be considered a transfer.

HB1224 says that all magazines that can hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition or can be readily modified to hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition are banned. Since almost all magazines have a removable base plate where an extender can be added this effectively bans almost all magazines.

I urge any one reporting on these issues to actually go read the bills at the Colorado Assembly web page.

Mar 22, 2013 4:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobber1956 wrote:
I think one of the biggest questions left unanswered is, “If you anti gun nuts WERE to get your way who do you think is going to keep you free and safe?” Not us (the gun nuts), you just alienated us. Did you ever stop to think that 90%+ of the military and law enforcement just might be gun nuts…and you have p—– us off? Sounds pretty stupid to me. But then I am just using common sense and we all know how outdated that is. You just might want to put all the drama on hold for a few minutes and think about all of this…

Mar 22, 2013 5:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
uravanbob wrote:
Hickenlooper and the rest of the Democratic legislators that amended the mag-limit bill to ‘allow’ for manufacturing magazines with capacities greater than their arbitrary limit are simply hypocrites. “We want your money, but you can’t sell your product here” and this sounds ok to whom?
They should all be run out of state tarred, feathered, and on a rail.

Mar 22, 2013 5:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.