Xcel Energy Updates 2013 Rate Case, Reduces Request

Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:06pm EDT

* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.

http://pdf.reuters.com/htmlnews/8knews.asp?i=43059c3bf0e37541&u=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20130325:nBw256179a

MINNEAPOLIS--(Business Wire)--
Citing changed circumstances since its November 2012 application, Xcel Energy
(NYSE:XEL) proposed a reduction to the electricity rate increase request
currently under review before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. The
company provided the revised request in testimony filed today. 

"This case is needed to support investments that will serve our customers well
over the long term," said Judy Poferl, president and CEO of Northern States
Power Co.-Minnesota, an Xcel Energy company. "Our revised request allows us to
facilitate these investments while reducing the size of our requested increase
for customers." 

The proposals reduce Xcel Energy`s requested rate increase to approximately $220
million, down from $285 million. The modified request represents an overall rate
increase of approximately 8.2 percent, down from 10.7 percent originally. 

"Our proposal takes a balanced approach, mitigating customer impacts now while
also meeting the company`s need to recover investments already made," Poferl
said. "We offer these proposals in an effort to reach a constructive outcome in
this case." 

Key reductions proposed by the company include:

* $35 million for Sherburne County (Sherco) Generating Station Unit 3 by
lowering and deferring some 2012 and 2013 costs for later recovery, to better
match the cost of the unit with its return to service later this year. The unit
is currently unavailable as it undergoes extensive repairs since a catastrophic
event in late 2011. 
* About $8 million for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant by deferring some
2013 costs for later recovery, subject to a review by the commission. 
* Approximately $9 million by smoothing the impacts of the 2008 recession on
pension expenses.

"We hope to work with the participants to further narrow the issues in this
case," Poferl said. "Rate requests are subject to extensive review prior to
approval, and customers can have confidence that the rate increases granted are
necessary for providing high-quality energy service." 

"While our prices are below the national average, we understand that any rate
increase has an impact on our customers," Poferl continued. "We urge our
customers to take advantage of our extensive suite of energy efficiency programs
to help manage and reduce their energy bills." 

More information can be found at www.xcelenergy.com. Copies of the rate case
filing and all other documents filed in the case are available on the
commission`s website at www.puc.state.mn.us. 

Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL) is a major U.S. electricity and natural gas company with
regulated operations in eight Western and Midwestern states. Xcel Energy
provides a comprehensive portfolio of energy-related products and services to
3.4 million electricity customers and 1.9 million natural gas customers through
its regulated operating companies. Company headquarters are located in
Minneapolis. 

Xcel Energy Electricity Rate Case Fact Sheet

Updated Request

* $220 million, an 8.2 percent increase in overall rates. If final rates are
higher than interim rates, customers will receive refunds with interest. 
* A typical residential customer`s monthly bill would increase by approximately
10 percent ($8). 
* 10.6 percent rate of return on equity (same as original)

Timeline

* Nov. 2, 2012: Original filing 
* Jan. 1, 2013: Interim rates take effect 
* March 4-22, 2013: Seven public hearings 
* April 18, 2013: Evidentiary hearings convene 
* September 2013: Minnesota Public Utilities Commission consideration and final
action expected 
* First Quarter 2014: New rates take effect

Background

* Extending the lives of the Prairie Island and Monticello nuclear plants and
expanding output at Monticello were previously approved by the Minnesota
commission and provide a low-cost, carbon-free resource for the future.
Investments are required now in order to extending the lives of these plants for
another 20 years. 
* Costs of the Monticello projects are similar to the experience of other
nuclear plant owners. The nuclear industry has changed tremendously over the
last few years. Even before the 2011 accident at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan, the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission was increasing requirements for both life
extension and capacity expansion projects. 
* Restoration of Sherco 3 is the largest such project Xcel Energy has ever
performed, and there are no equivalent restoration projects industry-wide.
During the repair process, damage that was not evident until repairs were under
way was discovered, which has delayed start-up from the first quarter of 2013 to
September 2013.

Xcel Energy
Xcel Energy Media Relations, 612-215-5300
www.xcelenergy.com

Copyright Business Wire 2013

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.