Exclusive: Afghanistan says ready to work for peace without Pakistan help

KABUL Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:45am EDT

Afghanistan's Deputy Foreign Minister Jawed Ludin talks on the phone before an interview in Kabul March 27, 2013. REUTERS/Mohammad Ismail

Afghanistan's Deputy Foreign Minister Jawed Ludin talks on the phone before an interview in Kabul March 27, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mohammad Ismail

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - Afghanistan is shocked by Pakistan's "complacency" in the nascent Afghan peace process and is ready to work without Islamabad's help on reconciliation, Deputy Foreign Minister Jawed Ludin told Reuters on Wednesday.

It was the first time Afghanistan has suggested the possibility of going it alone without its neighbor. Regional power Pakistan is seen as critical to stabilizing Afghanistan because of its long ties to insurgent groups.

Ludin also said the government would look to senior Taliban figures recently handed over by the United States in Bagram prison to urge militants to pursue peace. He did not elaborate.

Afghan officials had been pushing Pakistan hard to encourage the Taliban and other groups to join reconciliation efforts and Kabul had spoken of progress after Islamabad released some Taliban prisoners who could promote peace.

But Ludin, widely believed to shape foreign policy, told Reuters in an interview that Afghanistan had noted a shift in Pakistan's position towards peace efforts that are gaining more urgency as foreign forces prepare to leave by the end of 2014.

"We here in Kabul are in a bit of a state of shock at once again being confronted by the depth of Pakistan's complacency, we are just very disappointed," he said.

"But what has happened in the last few months for us, (we)see that Pakistan is changing the goal post every time we reach understanding."

Afghanistan also said it had canceled a military trip to Pakistan due to "unacceptable Pakistani shelling" of the country's mountainous eastern borderlands.

More than two dozen Pakistani artillery shells were fired into Afghanistan's eastern province of Kunar on Monday and Tuesday. The cancellation of the trip and days of angry diplomatic exchanges have placed further strain on a fraught relationship.

Afghanistan expressed its concern about what it called Pakistan's attempt to sideline President Hamid Karzai's government to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry during his visit to Kabul this week, said Ludin.

The deputy foreign minister, who is closely involved in peace efforts, said Afghanistan insisted that its High Peace Council, formed by Karzai, should spearhead any peace efforts.

Ludin said Pakistan had been trying to get the Taliban to talk to other parties, like the opposition, something he said would reverse gains.

"Suddenly, there is a new notion of the peace process now being introduced by Pakistan and that's 'well why should the Taliban talk to President Karzai or the High Peace Council?'" said Ludin. "They (Taliban) should in fact talk to other political parties. That's what they have told us," Ludin said.

"Pakistan's concept of the peace process is one that will reverse the achievement of the last 10 years that will negate the centrality of the Afghan state."

Although there have been several meetings in Western capitals over the last few months in which representatives of the Taliban met Afghan peace negotiators, there are no signs of any breakthrough.

RENEWED TENSIONS

Karzai is due to visit the Gulf Arab state of Qatar soon to discuss the opening of a Taliban office that could be used for peace contacts in the future.

Kabul has long been suspicious of Pakistan's intentions, accusing it of harboring the Taliban leadership in the city of Quetta, and using militants as proxies to counter the influence of rival India in Afghanistan.

But a few months ago, Kabul was encouraged after Pakistan released some Afghan Taliban prisoners from its jails.

Now relations seem to have taken a sharp turn for the worse as the United States winds down the war, now in its 12th year.

This week, Pakistani officials accused Karzai of being an impediment to the peace process.

Ludin suggested Pakistan wanted Afghanistan to remain unstable so that militant groups allegedly backed by Islamabad would be in a position to capitalize on instability after 2014.

"What they would like is again a fragmentation of the Afghan state and going back to the drawing board so that they can have another 10 years, at least another decade, of weak, compromised Afghan state," he said.

Ludin stressed that Pakistan was a pivotal player and Afghanistan would still welcome its support.

"The sad reality is though Pakistan still remains the most important missing link in this whole vision that we have," he said.

Karzai had worked too hard and taken too many political risks to let Pakistan dictate how peace efforts should proceed, Ludin said.

"He (Karzai) has spent his political capital on this, he has basically staked his own political capital, his own reputation, on this and he has really mobilized the whole country, the whole region in support of the process," said Ludin.

"It is laughable, laughable if Pakistanis think that the whole notion of the President Karzai is impediment to peace."

Karzai's government, he said, would now turn to some of the most senior, hardcore Taliban leaders behind bars in Bagram in its quest for peace.

"We will try to appeal to them and say: 'Look, continued reluctance of Taliban to stay away from peace process and any buy in to this whole Pakistani design that they should not to speak to the Afghan government, is dangerous,'" said Ludin.

"Now that we have them we will see who is ready to help in this process."

(Reporting by Michael Georgy and Hamid Shalizi; Editing by Ron Popeski)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
I think those who truly want peace will have peace.

Mar 27, 2013 8:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
truthtorpedo wrote:
Afghans should realize after over 30 years of helping the Afghan people, millions of them, more than any other nation on earth, Pakistan is most disliked by Afghans, more than even Russia which is responsible for millions of Afghan deaths, that now….Pakistanis are tired and suffering from Afghan fatigue, these uncivilized, warring people are like the tail of the dog, that refuses to straighten out and will remain curled no matter what.

So it is good that Pakistan is avoiding Afghanistan and its people, on one hand Afghans want no outside interference and blame Pakistan for interfering, on the other hand as this article reflects they accuse Pakistan of not helping or interfering, so this crackpot Afghan nation deserves only one solution, place it on IGNORE.

Mar 27, 2013 8:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gan.P wrote:
Surprise, Surprise! Bush was dumb enough to go after symptom that was Afghanistan rather than the root cause Pakistan. Pakistan is a client state of Saudi, then Libya, and now Iran. Also, Pakistan has continued to be the stooge of Enland and USA, Pakistan continues to be a stooge of China.

The reason? Remember that Pakistan has lost every war it has fought. The only war they now conduct is war by proxy, and their proxy are taliban. So, they are liable to create chaos in AFghanistan and exploit the chaos to recruit more taliban. Mark my words, Pakistan mischief with India is imminent.

Mar 27, 2013 8:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.