Nokia plays down $383 million India tax order

MUMBAI/COPENHAGEN Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:30am EDT

Low-cost handsets from Nokia on display at a Nokia store in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad March 4, 2013. REUTERS/Amit Dave

Low-cost handsets from Nokia on display at a Nokia store in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad March 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Amit Dave

Related Topics

MUMBAI/COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - Mobile phone maker Nokia Oyj has played down a multi-billion rupee tax demand from India, saying it did not have to pay any part of the demand for now and would continue to fight the claim.

Indian tax officials demanded Nokia pay 20.8 billion rupees ($383 million) in unpaid taxes, stepping up claims against foreign companies, although the Delhi High Court issued a stay on the demand.

The tax order, if enforced, would add to pressure on Nokia's finances which are already being strained by falling sales. The company axed its annual dividend payment for the first time in its history to shore up its cash position.

"Nokia reiterates its position is that it is in full compliance with local laws as well as the bilaterally negotiated tax treaty between the governments of India and Finland and will defend itself vigorously," the company said in a statement.

Nokia has seen a rapid dwindling of its cash reserves and ended 2012 with net cash of 4.4 billion euros ($5.6 billion), down 22 percent from a year earlier.

It was not clear how long the stay on the tax demand would remain in force.

The order from the Indian tax officials covered five fiscal years starting from 2006/07, according to a March 22 notice on an Indian court's website.

The demand comes as Asia's third-largest economy is aggressively pursuing tax claims against foreign companies as it seeks to rein in its budget deficit to avoid a credit rating downgrade.

Last month, a government official said tax authorities had accused Cadbury Plc, now part of U.S. snacks firm Mondelez International Inc, of misleading them about production from a new factory to avoid about $46 million in taxes.

Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Vodafone Group Plc and LG Electronics Inc are also among companies involved in tax disputes in India and have challenged the orders.

Nokia said it filed a writ before the Delhi High Court petitioning against the order. The court has asked the tax department to file a "counter-affidavit" within one week.

A lawyer for Nokia India assured the court that the company would not move any funds outside India, except in the normal course of business, until the date of the next court hearing, the court document showed.

Countries like India are crucial for Nokia's attempt to hold on to global market share after giving up its spot as market leader to Samsung. It has been expanding its Asha line of low-end smartphones and India is widely seen as a key market for such cheaper models.

The company last month objected to tax officials entering its factory in Chennai in southern India, which is one of its biggest facilities. Nokia said it has invested over $330 million in Chennai since setting up the factory in 2006.

(Reporting by Ritsuko Ando in Copenhagen and Sumeet Chatterjee in Mumbai; Additional reporting by Terhi Kinnunen in Helsinki; Editing by David Holmes)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Since Nokia Paid taxes owed to the Norwegian Government as it pertains to the Tax treaty between governments. If Money is owed the Norwegian gov will have to pay because Nokia isn’t going to be double taxed. The Tax Treaty says India is wrong and if the Norwegian gov is to pay it should be a parting gift to India as Vietnam is Almost ready

Mar 28, 2013 6:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.