BP puts U.S. wind farm arm up for sale

LONDON Wed Apr 3, 2013 4:51am EDT

A British Petroleum (BP) logo is seen at a petrol station near the Burj Khalifa in Dubai August 29, 2012. REUTERS/Jumana ElHeloueh

A British Petroleum (BP) logo is seen at a petrol station near the Burj Khalifa in Dubai August 29, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jumana ElHeloueh

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - BP (BP.L) has put its U.S. wind farm operation, one of the largest in the country, up for sale, marking the continued retreat of big oil companies from renewable energy investments while oil and gas projects offer them better returns.

The British oil company has already sold or earmarked for sale some $38 billion worth of assets, partly to raise funds to pay for its 2010 U.S. oil spill liabilities, but also to reposition itself as a smaller, leaner company with an emphasis on high-margin oil production and exploration. Reports said the sale could raise a further $1.5 billion.

BP would not put a value on any sale, but said in a statement it expected "attractive offers" for the assets. They include interests in 16 operating wind farms in nine states with a combined generating capacity of around 2,600 megawatts of renewable power, as well as a portfolio of projects in various stages of development.

Over a decade ago, big oil companies including BP and Shell began to ramp up investment in renewable energy. But the uncertain outlook for government subsidies and prices in solar, wind and other clean energy areas, along with the re-emergence of strong prices for oil and opportunities to develop large gas fields, have since distracted their attention.

BP, which under former chief executive John Browne once named itself "Beyond Petroleum", still has a substantial interest in Brazilian biofuels, but has invested only about $1 billion a year in renewables since 2005 from a total capital spending budget of well over $20 billion annually. It has no specific investment plans for the sector in the years ahead.

(Reporting by Andrew Callus; Editing by Mark Potter)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
GLK wrote:
Energy is about oil and coal. And, until someone invents Mr. Fusion, it’s always gonna be about oil and coal.

Apr 03, 2013 7:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Burns0011 wrote:
It’s still a good idea to invest in wind, solar, and other more exotic forms of power generation, to slow down demand for oil and coal. If nothing else, these alternate forms of energy production have less impact on the air we breathe and the water we drink.

Even nuclear has less of an impact on our environment than oil and coal do, because we treat nuclear materials like hazardous poisons, which is something we *don’t* do with oil or coal.

Apr 03, 2013 12:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Harry079 wrote:
I guess BP is not happy unless they can kill their workers, destroy the enviroment and payoff a bunch of politicians.

Apr 03, 2013 8:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.