U.S. considers less prison time for ex-Enron CEO Skilling

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK Thu Apr 4, 2013 11:30am EDT

Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling (L) and attorney Daniel Petrocelli cross the street as they arrive at the Federal court in Houston April 13, 2006. REUTERS/Richard Carson

Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling (L) and attorney Daniel Petrocelli cross the street as they arrive at the Federal court in Houston April 13, 2006.

Credit: Reuters/Richard Carson

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Jeffrey Skilling, the former Enron Corp chief executive serving a 24-year prison term over the energy company's spectacular collapse, may get a chance to leave prison early.

The U.S. Department of Justice has notified victims of Enron's fraud and 2001 bankruptcy that prosecutors may enter an agreement with Skilling that could result in a resentencing.

Skilling, 59, has served about 6-1/4 years in prison following his May 2006 conviction by a Houston federal jury on 19 counts of securities fraud, conspiracy, insider trading and lying to auditors.

It is unclear how much Skilling's sentence could be reduced, and a Justice Department official said no agreement has been reached. CNBC, the television business channel, said prosecutors and Skilling's lawyers have been negotiating a shorter term.

Skilling has maintained his innocence, and according to court filings has been pursuing a new trial.

He is scheduled to leave prison around February 2028, assuming good behavior, according to federal prison records.

Daniel Petrocelli, a lawyer for Skilling, could not be reached immediately on Thursday for comment.

A new sentence would require the approval of U.S. District Judge Sim Lake in Houston, who had imposed the original sentence.

Once ranked seventh on the Fortune 500 list of large U.S. companies, Enron went bankrupt on December 2, 2001. Its demise led to reforms including the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


In a Wednesday notice, the Justice Department advised former Enron employees, stockholders and other victims that it is "considering entering into a sentencing agreement" with Skilling.

It gives former them until April 17 to voice objections.

In 2009, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Skilling's conviction, but called his sentence too harsh.

The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court also upheld the conviction, but rejected one legal theory behind it. In 2011, the 5th Circuit reaffirmed the conviction.

Skilling had previously agreed to forfeit $45 million to be used as restitution for victims of Enron's fraud. That money has been held up because of the negotiations on a new sentence.

At the 2006 trial, the Houston jury also found Kenneth Lay, who was Enron's chief executive before and after Skilling's six-month term, guilty of fraud and conspiracy.

Lay died in July 2006, and his death led to his conviction being thrown out.

Among those who testified against Skilling and Lay was Andrew Fastow, who was Enron's chief financial officer and considered the mastermind behind the company's fraud.

Fastow was sentenced to six years in prison and released in December 2011.

The case is U.S. v. Skilling, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, No. 04-cr-00025.

(Reporting by Aruna Viswanatha in Washington, D.C. and Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Jeffrey Benkoe)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
Mainspring44 wrote:
Let us also urge DoJ to approve Skilling’s speedy re-entrance into high finance, where he can rejoin all the lesser lights of Enron financial bubble machinations that fled to shelter. Who fled undenounced and scattered their kiting practices more widely. With five of nine Supremes pro-business and DoJ jostling to prove it is more so, why would Americans expect anything else?

Apr 04, 2013 10:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
thebasics wrote:
I think they should let him out one year earlier but with one stipulation: the defense attorney, his staff, and the judge donate all of their life savings to the people who lost theirs to Skilling’s illegal actions. “Treat others like you would like to be treated”.

Apr 04, 2013 10:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Harry079 wrote:
“It is unclear how much Skilling’s term could be shortened under a resentencing agreement.”

Hmmmmm let me guess: To time served?

Or better yet to 4 years and the government has to pay him for the last two years of cruel and unusual punishment for this wonderful man.

Apr 04, 2013 10:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.