U.N. observers failing mandate to track Hezbollah arms: Israel

TEL AVIV Fri Apr 5, 2013 1:35am EDT

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talks at a news conference with U.S. President Barack Obama in Jerusalem, March 20, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talks at a news conference with U.S. President Barack Obama in Jerusalem, March 20, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

TEL AVIV (Reuters) - U.N. peacekeepers in southern Lebanon have failed to report on Hezbollah guerrilla armaments as required, a senior Israeli official said on Thursday, arguing that Israel could not rely on foreign intervention for its security.

The remarks underscored the conservative strategies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as instability rocks Israel's neighbors and world powers urge it to roll back its West Bank occupation to make way for a Palestinian state.

"Under pressure, a multi-national force is like an umbrella that gets folded up on a rainy day," Yaakov Amidror, Netanyahu's national security adviser, said in a Tel Aviv University speech.

Iranian- and Syrian-backed Hezbollah, Amidror said, has been building its arsenal despite the 35-year presence of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in its heartland.

"Has Hezbollah avoided bringing any kind of rocket, missile or other arms into southern Lebanon because UNIFIL is there?" he said. Israel believes Hezbollah has amassed 60,000 rockets, including 5,000 with heavy warheads capable of hitting Tel Aviv.

"Under their (UNIFIL) mandate, they cannot stop Hezbollah and confiscate its arms, but they can write a report. There has been no UNIFIL report about any weapon of any Hezbollah person since UNIFIL has existed," Amidror said.

As part of the U.N. ceasefire that ended Israel's inconclusive 2006 war with Hezbollah, UNIFIL's mandate was enhanced to include "assisting" the Lebanese army with keeping guerrilla "personnel, assets and weapons" out of south Lebanon.

UNIFIL spokesman Andrea Tenenti said that since 2006, the U.N. peacekeepers had "not witnessed the entry of any illegal weapons into the UNIFIL area of operations in south Lebanon".

While the border is largely quiet, Israel fears Hezbollah could pound it with rockets in retaliation should it carry out long-threatened strikes on Iran's nuclear sites.

Israel also worries that Hezbollah could obtain advanced weapons, including chemical munitions, from Syria. But the militia has said its current capabilities are sufficient.

In their own breach of the 2006 truce, the Israelis have regularly sent warplanes on surveillance flights over Lebanon.

Israel withdrew from south Lebanon in 2000 after 22 years of occupation, and from the Gaza Strip in 2005 after 38 years of occupation. Armed threats from Hezbollah in the former, and Palestinian Hamas Islamists in the latter, have been cited by Netanyahu as justifying his reluctance to give up the West Bank.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, the Hamas rival who governs in the West Bank, has accused Israel of sabotaging diplomacy by peppering the territory with Jewish settlements and holding up funds for his U.S.-backed administration.

The Israelis question Abbas's ability to govern long-term.

"If there aren't the appropriate security arrangements, it would be better for Israel to go without an accord (with the Palestinians) than to have an accord that will endanger its security and could bring about a situation in which in the next war, Israel will lose," Amidror said.

(Writing by Dan Williams and Dominic Evans; Editing by Jason Webb)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Arnleif wrote:
Another one of Israel`s “special rights” I assume.

The right to attack anyone without facing any form of retaliation or consequences whatsoever.

A senior Israeli official said, (in his usual attempt to self victimise Israel as all alone in the world against all the evil)
:
Israel can not rely on foreign intervention for its “security”. (real meaning: expansion).

One might wonder if this senior Israeli official, has a short memory. Mere weeks ago the US pledged it`s “undying” support for Israel. And as usual taunted the Palestinians and the rest of the region with the usual claim that the US are a “neutral” negotiator.

Israel claim they occupy territory because of security. We can all se that they build settlements there, drill for oil and exploit the territory as their own. So the most moderate conclusion that comes to mind is then that the meaning of the word security is synonymous with expansion in Israeli language.

The mere arrogance of these people are astonishing. Israels`s denial of the obvious role the US has in supporting Israel through massive aid to Israel, vetoing UN resolutions, suppressing other countries in the region by supporting dictators and through millenary threats choke any democratic opinion from the region about the Israel/ Palestine conflict.

One can hope the US population at one point rally to remove support for Israel, just like when the population of the US demanded that the US government removed support for the apartheid regime in South Africa.

Apr 05, 2013 7:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
maria_ave wrote:
Why is my comment censored when a completely unrelated comment about support Israel receives is kept? That is blatantly stupid. The article has nothing to do with racist claims by closet anti-Semites about Apartheid. The article relates to the 10s of thousands of missiles shot at Israel and the ceasefire agreement, with a terorist organization that turned Lebanon from a Christian majority country to a Muslim majority country, and broadcasts racist theories about Jews daily on its TV chanel … at least pretend to be balanced evil rueters. Accuse me of anything you are still evil to censor that.

Apr 05, 2013 1:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus