Despite tough talk, China's North Korea options limited

BEIJING Mon Apr 8, 2013 7:20am EDT

China's President Xi Jinping speaks during a meeting with representatives of entrepreneurs at the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) annual conference in Boao town, Hainan province April 8, 2013. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu (CHINA - Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS) - RTXYCYU

China's President Xi Jinping speaks during a meeting with representatives of entrepreneurs at the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) annual conference in Boao town, Hainan province April 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Tyrone Siu (CHINA - Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS) - RTXYCYU


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

BEIJING (Reuters) - Unprecedented Chinese criticism of North Korea is unlikely to mean tough new action against Pyongyang because if China pushes too hard and its troublesome neighbor collapses, the result would be disastrous for Beijing.

That limits the options for China, even as it has grown frustrated with Pyongyang since the reclusive state carried out a third nuclear test in February and ramped up the saber-rattling in response to the U.N. sanctions that followed.

Restricting or cutting off food and energy supplies as well as strictly implementing U.N. sanctions would hurt North Korea. It's unclear whether such measures by China could lead to the downfall of the regime of young leader Kim Jong-un.

But Beijing will likely never risk a scenario that could prompt waves of North Koreans to flee across the border and at the same time leave nuclear material unsupervised.

"China is coming to the conclusion that North Korea is becoming a liability and it needs to take steps to deal with it," said Paul Haenle, former China director on the U.S. National Security Council and White House representative to stalled six-party talks aimed at getting Pyongyang to end its nuclear activities.

"(But) I don't think we'll see dramatic shifts overnight and I don't think we'll see publicly announced shifts. This is the kind of thing that will happen gradually and will happen behind the scenes."

Over the weekend, China's foreign minister said it would not allow "trouble making" on its doorstep while President Xi Jinping appeared to rebuke North Korea during a speech in which he said no country should be allowed to cause chaos "for selfish gain".

U.S. lawmakers in turn criticized China, saying it had failed to rein in North Korea.

But Beijing does not have the influence it is often assumed to have in North Korea, a country used to isolation and deeply suspicious of outsiders, even of China, which came to Pyongyang's aid in the 1950-53 Korean War.

"North Korea and China do not depend on each other as much as some people think," said Chung Young-chul, a North Korea expert at Sogang University's Graduate School of Public Policy in Seoul.

"Culturally and historically, as South Koreans do, North Koreans also have a penchant for demeaning the Chinese ... And North Koreans strongly oppose being flunkeys for China."


China negotiated the U.N. sanctions with the United States that were imposed in response to the February 12 nuclear test and has said it wanted them implemented.

The measures tighten financial curbs on North Korea, order checks of suspicious cargo and strengthen a ban on luxury goods entering the country.

China has said nothing publicly about what it has done to implement the sanctions on the ground.

Some commodities traders have noted a slowdown in the trade of iron ore and coking coal from North Korea. South Korean media has said China has been refusing to renew visas for North Korean factory workers in the Chinese border city of Dandong.

One South Korean media report also said China had fired a warning shot to North Korean banks in China, telling them to stay within the remit of their permitted operations.

China did not export crude oil to North Korea in February, customs data showed, the first absence of deliveries since the same month in 2012. But data has also shown no exports in February 2011. Data for March has not been released yet.

In any case, the question remains: how to punish a country which has so few links with the outside world?

"For an economically closed country whose government does not make the people's welfare its mission, the effects of sanctions will not be obvious," the Economic Observer, a well-regarded weekly Chinese business newspaper, wrote in a commentary on its website on Monday.

"It's like trying to tell a thin person to watch their weight."

This isn't to say that Beijing's hands are totally tied.

Having backed the latest U.N. sanctions, China could enforce them to exert just enough pain to get North Korea back to the negotiating table but not enough to cause the country to implode, the widely read and influential tabloid the Global Times said on Monday.

"This pressure should not cause a horrible worsening of the domestic situation in North Korea but let them know how important outside aid is to the country," wrote Yang Lei, an international relations professor at Tianjin's Nankai University.

Beijing would never do anything as drastic as cutting trade ties, as some U.S. politicians have demanded, because of the impact it would have on China, said Sun Zhe, a China-U.S. expert at Beijing's elite Tsinghua University.

To ease tensions, Washington should end the military exercises with South Korea that have riled the North and offer to hold talks with Pyongyang, he added.

"You are asking China to do something very serious, and yet the U.S. government won't make even a symbolic move like stopping military drills," Sun said.

(Additional reporting by Sally Huang, and Park Jun-min in SEOUL. Editing by Dean Yates)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (14)
xraydude wrote:
People keep repeating how disastrous it would be for China to have North Korea collapse and unified with the South. That may have been true 60 years ago during the cold war, but that thinking seems out of place today. China and South Korea have more in common with each other than with the North. China has to be competent enough to recognize they would be better off with a stable economic trading partner on their border. Their current North Korean neighbor is a disaster with nuclear explosions, missile testing, and a starving population always in need of food aid. In its own way, China should be pushing for Kim Jong Un’s exit and for Korean unification.

Apr 08, 2013 8:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
reality-again wrote:
Interesting article, but the main argument it presents is moot, because South Korea is rich enough to take care of its Northern sister state in case the latter collapses economically, and more importantly, a war in the Korean peninsula would have grave consequences for Chinese trade.

The real problem seems to be that China’s leaders don’t accept the fact that they’re called for cation, namely to get rid of the the criminal regime in North Korea, and work together with South Korea and the US to establish peace and prosperity in that area of the world, which happens to be on China’s doorstep.

International relations sometimes mean action, not just nice words.

Apr 08, 2013 9:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
splendid wrote:
People should visit North Korea before they judge it based on media hype. anyone can go

Apr 08, 2013 9:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.