All Syria chemical arms claims must be probed: U.N.'s Ban

THE HAGUE Mon Apr 8, 2013 8:39am EDT

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon speaks at a news conference at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the Hague April 8, 2013. REUTERS/Michael Kooren

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon speaks at a news conference at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the Hague April 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Michael Kooren

Related Topics

THE HAGUE (Reuters) - An advance team of U.N.-mandated experts has gone to Cyprus and is awaiting permission from the Syrian government to investigate allegations of chemical weapons attacks, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Monday.

The move puts pressure on Syria to grant access to the team, as Damascus resists extending the investigation beyond a government claim that rebels used chemical munitions near Aleppo to include rebel claims that President Bashar al-Assad's government has used them.

Syria's ally Russia has backed Damascus against demands from Western powers that the probe be widened. Ban made clear that he wanted an all-encompassing inquiry, saying it was the "firm principle" of the United Nations that investigators be granted access to all areas where chemical weapons were allegedly used.

After meeting the head of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which is providing scientists and equipment, in The Hague, Ban said an advance team was in Cyprus, ready to go to Syria within 24 hours.

"All we are waiting for is the go-ahead from the Syrian government to determine whether any chemicals weapons were used, in any location," Ban said.

"I urge the Syrian government to be more flexible, so that this mission can be deployed as fast as possible," he said. "We are ready, it is a matter of time."

Ahmet Uzumcu, head of the OPCW, said the full mission would comprise 15 experts, including inspectors, medical experts and chemists.

It will be headed by Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom, a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq, whom Ban also met in The Hague. Sellstrom was to join the advance team on Monday.

Ban said all serious claims regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria should be examined, and urged speed so that evidence was preserved.

"The use of chemical weapons by any side, under any circumstances, would constitute an outrageous crime with dire consequences," he said.

Britain and France want to broaden the probe to include Homs and Damascus, where rebels say state forces used chemical munitions. They also blame the government for the incident near Aleppo.

Russia, which has used its veto-wielding seat on the U.N. Security Council to counter Western pressure on Syria, has suggested that Western countries are using the specter of weapons of mass destruction to justify intervention in Syria, as they did in Iraq.

The OPCW, established to oversee the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention, has helped to destroy roughly 80 percent of chemical weapons stockpiles declared by 188 members.

Syria is one of just eight countries not to have joined, along with Angola, Egypt, Israel, Myanmar, North Korea, Somalia and South Sudan.

Syria is believed to have one of the largest remaining stockpiles of undeclared chemical weapons in the world, making it a priority security issue for Washington and its European allies.

(Editing by Kevin Liffey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
georgehunt1 wrote:
Dincho: It seems to me that Russia’s opinion that enemies of the Syrian government are trying to hustle Syria into a corner. I recall that a
provisional council was the sly political move technique employed by the Bolsheviks to topple the Russian government through peace-seeking discussions. Syria’s government seems to be enduring similar pressures from the U.N. and the West to force them into political corners.

Apr 08, 2013 10:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
jkf wrote:
This is just a tactic by the US and UK to make the investigation impossible. Just like with the Houla massacre where the UN determined the evidence was too “murky” to determine what happened yet both countries and France immediately and outright lied and said “Assad is guilty!” The hypocrisy would be laughable if the situation in Syria weren’t so serious. The very fact that France was fighting in Mali the same forces they are supporting in Syria should have woke people up but didn’t. This conflict is regime change – not a popular revolt. Regime change to satisfy Qatar and Saudi Arabia’s bid for the region to establish Wahhabi Sunnism everywhere and gain complete control of the oil and natural gas pipeline $$$. We support them because we believe their lies of support for our “interests”. Our interests seem to lie more with oil companies than people.

Apr 08, 2013 10:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.