Bin Laden son-in-law lawyers may seek to move trial out of NYC

NEW YORK Mon Apr 8, 2013 5:37pm EDT

An artist sketch shows Suleiman Abu Ghaith, a militant who appeared in videos as a spokesman for al Qaeda after the September 11, 2001 attacks, appearing at the U.S. District Court in Manhattan March 8, 2013. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

An artist sketch shows Suleiman Abu Ghaith, a militant who appeared in videos as a spokesman for al Qaeda after the September 11, 2001 attacks, appearing at the U.S. District Court in Manhattan March 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jane Rosenberg

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A lawyer for a son-in-law of Osama bin Laden said on Monday that he may try to move his client's trial out of New York, saying he was concerned about having the proceedings in the city that saw the greatest destruction from the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Suleiman Abu Ghaith's attorneys said at a federal court hearing in Manhattan that they are considering a request for change of venue.

Martin Cohen, one of the defense attorneys, said after the hearing that the concern stems from the potential "prejudicial nature" of having a trial in New York. He declined to say where the defense might seek to move the case.

Abu Ghaith, who acted as an al Qaeda spokesman in videos, has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring to kill Americans. He is one of the highest-ranking al Qaeda figures to face trial in the United States for crimes related to the September 11 attacks.

The bearded, balding Abu Ghaith did not speak at Monday's hearing after being escorted into the courtroom in handcuffs. He listened to a translation of the proceedings through headphones.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is presiding over the case, did not set a trial date. He said a trial could start this September or next January.

Cohen said a September start would overburden the Federal Defenders of New York, a nonprofit group providing Abu Ghaith's defense. Each lawyer at the organization, which receives federal funding, has to take off 5-1/2 weeks from work by October because of sequestration cuts, he told Kaplan.

Kaplan said it was "extremely troublesome to contemplate a case of this nature to be delayed because of sequestration."

Abu Ghaith was captured in Jordan on February 28 and brought secretly to the United States by the FBI on March 1.

The case is Unites States of America v. Hage et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 98-01023

(Reporting by Bernard Vaughan; Editing by Martha Graybow and Prudence Crowther)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
cyke1 wrote:
“Martin Cohen, one of the defense attorneys, said after the hearing that the concern stems from the potential “prejudicial nature” of having a trial in New York.”

Yea don’t matter where the trial happens there will be.

Apr 08, 2013 5:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobber1956 wrote:
Move it to Gitmo where it belongs!

Apr 08, 2013 6:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus